In patients with acute onset of stroke-like symptoms, imaging can rule out nonvascular causes of the symptoms, define the extent of an acute ischemic process, differentiate between the infarcted core and the ischemic penumbra of an area of acute ischemic change, possibly identify the cause of an acute ischemic process, and identify which patients might benefit from thrombolytic therapy. The authors review the use of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, diffusion/perfusion MR, perfusion CT, and CT angiography in the setting of acute stroke.
Dr. Choksi
is a Lecturer in the Department of Radiology,
Dr. Quint
is a Professor of Neuroradiology and MRI,
Dr. Maly-Sundgren
is an Associate Professor of Neuroradiology, and
Dr. Hoeffner
is an Assistant Professor of Neuroradiology Department of
Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor,
MI.
Symptomatic cerebral infarction ("stroke") affects more than
750,000 Americans each year and has a mortality of 22%.
1
It is the third leading cause of death in the United States and the
annual costs are estimated to be $45 billion.
1
Until the mid 1990s, management of stroke patients usually involved
supportive care in the acute period, followed by a diagnostic
workup in an attempt to define a cause of the patient's symptoms
for which treatment might be instituted with the goal of preventing
future events. For example, computed tomography (CT) was performed
to rule out other pathologic processes that can present with
stroke-like symptoms, such as neoplasms, acute extra-axial fluid
collections (epidural hematomas, subdural hematomas), infections,
or any cause of a seizure (masses, vascular malformation). CT was
also performed to rule out hemorrhage associated with an area of
cerebral infarction that would contraindicate anticoagulation
therapy. Later, diagnostic workup including cerebral angiography
was often performed to identify arterial abnormalities that might
be amenable to surgical (eg, endarterectomy) or medical (eg,
anti-platelet, anticoagulation) therapy.
In 1995, the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders Study
(NINDS) Group
2
reported that the use of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue
plasminogen activator (t-PA), if administered to patients with
ischemic stroke within 3 hours of symptom onset, resulted in an
absolute improved outcome (end point: little or no disability 3
months after the event). This work has been confirmed by subsequent
studies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the
use of IV t-PA for this purpose in 1996. The use of thrombolytic
therapy for intra-arterial treatment of anterior circulation
thrombi has been shown to be efficacious up to 6 hours after
symptom onset
3,4
; but as of the end of 2004, the FDA had not yet approved its use
for this purpose.
Early imaging has become crucial in the management of these
patients. Specifically, acute intracranial hemorrhage and
nonvascular causes of stroke symptoms need to be ruled out within 3
hours of symptom onset so that the use of IV t-PA can be
considered. As t-PA is not a benign drug (it is associated with a
10-fold increased risk of causing an intracranial hemorrhage),
imaging has become an important tool for identifying which patients
may benefit from thrombolytic therapy and which patients may not
and, therefore, should not be exposed to the risks of such
treatment. Imaging also provides information that could potentially
identify subgroups of patients who might benefit most from
aggressive therapy beyond the accepted "therapeutic window" of 3
hours. Therefore, it is important for interpreters of imaging
studies to be aware of specifically what to search for and report
upon on emergent scans.
Computed tomography
CT remains the predominant imaging modality for initial
evaluation of patients with suspected stroke. Lesions that
clinically can mimic ischemic stroke, such as hemorrhages, tumors,
infections, vascular malformations, etc., can be excluded. Most CT
scans are negative with respect to early signs of an acute ischemic
process in the first 6 hours after symptom onset (which, as
mentioned above, is the current "therapeutic window" during which
pharmacologic intervention can affect patient outcome). However,
several subtle parenchymal findings reflecting underlying cytotoxic
edema (an early pathophysiologic finding in ischemia) can sometimes
be seen and should be searched for. Such signs include "blurring"
of the gray matter-white matter junction due to decreased
attenuation of the gray matter as manifested by the "insular
ribbon" sign (loss of the usual slightly increased attenuation of
the insular cortex just superficial to the external/extreme
capsules [Figure 1]) or "obscuration" of the lentiform nucleus
(loss of the normal attenuation difference of the globus pallidus
and/or putamen with respect to contiguous white matter structures
[Figure 2]). In patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA)
territory ischemia, local mass effect in the form of effacement of
sulci or narrowing of the sylvian fissure may also be identified.
These parenchymal changes, when seen in the first 3 hours after
onset of stroke symptoms, appear to correlate with stroke severity.
5
An extraparenchymal CT finding that can be identified as early
as 90 minutes
6,7
after symptom onset is the "hyperdense vessel sign" (Figure 3),
which is usually seen in the proximal (M1 segment) MCA, but can be
seen in any arterial structure.
8,9
The increased density in the vessel is thought to be secondary to
local slow intravascular blood flow due to an intra-arterial
thrombus or may represent direct visualization of the thrombus
itself.
6,8
While the NINDS study
2
established that IV t-PA was useful if given to patients with
nonhemorrhagic stroke within 3 hours of symptom onset regardless of
associated parenchymal ischemic changes, the European Cooperative
Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) trial
10
studied patients with stroke symptoms of <6 hours' duration who
had CT-demonstrable ischemic changes involving no more than one
third of the MCA territory. This and subsequent studies revealed
that although patients with CT-demonstrable parenchymal changes
within the first 3 hours after symptom onset have a relatively
worse outcome than patients who present with symptoms but no
abnormalities on CT,
5
they may still benefit from IV t-PA administration if the
identified parenchymal changes involve less than one third of a
vascular territory.
Therefore, when reporting a CT scan for this patient population,
pertinent findings to be mentioned include: the presence or absence
of hemorrhage, the presence and extent of any ischemic parenchymal
changes, and the presence or absence of nonvascular etiologies of
stroke-like symptoms.
MR imaging
Conventional (standard spin-echo) magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) shows essentially the same parenchymal changes that can be
seen on CT scanning, but with a greater degree of sensitivity and
specificity.
8
Cytotoxic edema of gray matter is seen as increased T2 signal and,
in the case of MCA ischemia, is often first identified in the
region of the insular cortex (ie, the MR corollary of the "insular
ribbon" sign on a CT scan) or involving the lentiform nuclei of the
basal ganglia (ie, the MR corollary of "obscuration" of the
lentiform nucleus on a CT scan). Similarly, mild mass effect
associated with early ischemic change is usually easier to identify
on MRI. The greater contrast resolution of MR permits the earlier
and more confident delineation of these findings, though these
changes are still usually not seen for 3 to 4 hours. Exaggerated
intravascular contrast enhancement reflecting relative stasis of
contrast material within blood vessels in the involved ischemic
territory is an MR sign of an acute vascular occlusion.
8
While this sign can be seen within minutes of an occlusion, as it
can persist for up to a week and does not identify the specific
blood vessel involved, it is therefore relatively nonspecific for
identifying a hyperacute area of ischemic change.
Diffusion MR (dMR)
Diffusion-weighted MRI (
d
MR) is based on the principle that random Brownian motion of water
molecules in tissues can be measured and quantified. Water
molecules that are not "restricted" by cell membranes,
macromolecules, or other structures will have greater net diffusion
over a given period of time than will water molecules surrounded by
cell organelles, membranes, large proteins, etc. Therefore, water
molecules in the lateral ventricles have "high" (a large amount of)
diffusion while water molecules within a cell have more "limited"
diffusion.
During an acute ischemic event, cellular adenosine triphosphate
(ATP) is depleted, leading to failure of cell membrane
sodium-potassium pumps. This (along with other chemical effects)
leads to an acute influx of water into cells with swelling of the
affected cells (cytotoxic edema). The end result is that the
increased intracellular water (which shows less overall diffusion
than does extracellular interstitial water) demonstrates a decrease
in the amount of net diffusion of water present in brain parenchyma
experiencing cytotoxic edema. (It should be noted that there are
alternative explanations for what is occurring at the cellular
level, but the end result is the same with respect to imaging.)
The net diffusion of water for any given tissue can be measured
and displayed on a
d
MR scan (Figure 4A). Areas of decreased water diffusion will be
seen as areas of increased signal on
d
MR and can be seen as early as 22 minutes after an ischemic insult.
11
As
d
MR findings can occasionally be mimicked by chronic T2-changes
(so-called "T2 shine-through"), apparent diffusion coefficient
(ADC) maps (Figure 4B) can be generat-
12,13
that reflect only diffusion data. Changes on
d
MR scans or ADC maps are usually considered evidence of
irreversible ischemic damage, though there are reports of reversal
of
d
MR findings after successful recanalization of a blood vessel with
intra-arterial thrombolysis.
14
Similarly, although
d
MR is considered a sensitive method for ruling out infarction,
there have also been case reports of patients with initially
(within 4 hours) negative
d
MR scans who went on to cerebral infarction.
15
MRI is considered a better test than CT for identifying acute
ischemic changes, with
d
MR being a highly specific test for early detection of usually
irreversible parenchymal injury.
Perfusion imaging
Perfusion imaging, be it perfusion MR (
p
MR) or perfusion CT (
p
CT), evaluates the characteristics of blood flow to a given region
of the brain. It is recognized that brain parenchyma can be
hypoperfused without permanent parenchymal injury. Therefore, a
brain region with lower than normal perfusion can either be
infarcted or be at increased risk to progress to infarction. The
concept of "ischemic penumbra" refers to an area of reduced brain
parenchymal perfusion with or without associated loss of neuronal
function, but with involved neurons remaining viable.
16
This area of the brain is considered "at risk" to go on to
irreversible infarction if blood flow is not improved. This area of
brain usually separates an area of frank cerebral infarction
(presumably irreversible injury) from normal brain. It is this area
of the brain that aggressive IV thrombolytic or neurointerventional
management targets to protect from further injury. The time period
during which brain tissue within the ischemic penumbra remains
viable is debated,
17
as the transition of brain tissue from potentially reversible to
irreversible injury is dependent on the severity and duration of
the underlying ischemic process.
16
As a patient with a significant penumbra territory is likely to
benefit from thrombolytic therapy, one of the current goals of
imaging is to try to identify this "at risk" brain tissue so that
appropriate aggressive therapy can be targeted to this region.
Similarly, if imaging can indicate that there is little or no
penumbral territory, those patients should probably not be exposed
to the risks of aggressive therapy, because there may be little
viable brain to salvage.
Perfusion MR
Perfusion MR imaging can be performed by multiple different
techniques, However, a contrast-enhanced dynamic susceptibility
(T2*-weighted) bolus technique is most commonly used. Hemodynamic
maps are generated based on the degree of signal-intensity decrease
identified on rapidly acquired scans obtained as a bolus of IV
contrast material passes through the brain. Various hemodynamic
parameters such as relative cerebral blood flow (CBF; in mL/min),
relative cerebral blood volume (CBV; in mL), mean transit time
(MTT; in sec), bolus arrival time (in sec) and flow heterogeneity
18
can be measured and/or calculated (Figure 5). Uninvolved
contralateral brain tissue is presumed to be "normal," and ratios
of abnormal/nor-mal can be determined. The exact role of each
perfusion parameter in the evaluation of patients for determining
the ischemic core (area of irreversible infarction), ischemic
penumbra (area of hypoperfusion, but still potentially salvageable
brain) and the final infarction size remains controversial.
14,17,19-
MR diffusion-perfusion mismatch
If an area of MR perfusion abnormality (that theoretically can
include areas of salvageable brain) is larger than the underlying
area of MR diffusion abnormality (which presumably represents
irreversibly damaged brain tissue-the ischemic core) (Figure 5),
then the difference in the amount of affected brain between these 2
studies may represent an area of potentially salvageable brain, the
ischemic penumbra. The identification or exclusion of such an MR
diffusion-perfusion mismatch may be the key for determining which
patients might maximally benefit from aggressive (eg, thrombolytic
or interventional) therapy.
23
Perfusion CT
Perfusion CT is performed in a manner similar to
p
MR. Serial CT scans are acquired rapidly to dynamically track a
bolus of IV contrast material as it travels through the brain
24
at a single location (ie, the basal ganglia region in the case of
suspected MCA stroke) or at several contiguous locations (but
covering no more than a 2-cm-thick slab of the brain). Again,
hemodynamic maps of brain perfusion can be generated as this
contrast bolus passes through the brain. Different parameters,
including time-to-peak (TTP; the time that elapses between the
start of an IV contrast injection and the maximal attenuation of
contrast-enhanced blood as it passes through a defined region of
the brain), MTT (which can be oversimplified to be considered the
time it takes blood to flow from a major cerebral artery feeding a
given region of the brain to the major cerebral vein draining that
region), CBV (the volume of blood in a defined portion of the brain
at any given time), and CBF (cerebral blood volume/min) can be
measured or calculated. While there is debate about the
significance and reliability of these parameters, some researchers
24,25
believe that CBF (or MTT) on
p
CT is similar to a perfusion abnormality on
p
MR, while CBV on
p
CT is similar to a diffusion abnormality on
p
MR, so that a CBF/CBV (or MTT/CBV) "mismatch" on perfusion CT
(Figure 6) is similar to a perfusion/diffusion "mismatch" on MR
(Figure 5) and may have the same implications with respect to
identifying the presence or absence of an ischemic penumbra and the
potential usefulness of aggressive neurointerventional therapy in
any given patient.
CT angiography
CT angiography (CTA) is best performed on a late-generation
multislice CT scanner on which a fast thin-section volumetric
spiral examination is performed during a time-optimized bolus of IV
contrast material injection with opacification of blood vessels.
9,26
Complete imaging of the craniocervical circulation from the aortic
arch through the circle of Willis region can be performed in as
little as 20 seconds. High-resolution two-dimensional (2D)
(multiplanar reformatted [MPR]) or three-dimensional (3D)
reconstructed images presented as maximum intensity projection
(MIP) or shaded surface display (SSD) images (Figure 7) can be
obtained. CT angiography can be performed at the same time that a
dedicated cranial CT examination is performed, as CTA requires
relatively little patient cooperation, is a quick examination, and
can identify sites of intracranial or extracranial vessel stenosis
or occlusion as possible underlying causes of a patient's acute
symptoms. It can, therefore, potentially identify the source of an
ischemic process to aid in the planning of (sometimes emergent)
definitive therapy.
Conclusion
The current role of imaging in patients with acute onset of
stroke-like symptoms not only includes ruling out nonvascular
causes of stroke-like symptoms, excluding intracranial hemorrhage,
and defining the extent of an acute ischemic process, but also
differentiating between the infarcted core and the ischemic
penumbra of an area of acute ischemic change and, if possible, to
identify the cause of an acute ischemic process. Standard CT and MR
scanning, diffusion/perfusion MR, perfusion CT, and CTA (and
possibly MRA) each has a potential role in defining an abnormality
and determining appropriate emergent management in these patients.
In the future, it is hoped that some combination of these imaging
techniques, and possibly others (eg, MR spectroscopy, MR tensor
imaging), will help identify potentially salvageable brain tissue
beyond the currently accepted short (3- to 6-hour) window.
Products used
- 1.5TSigna Horizon LX MR scanner, with 10.0 software (GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, WI)
- GE Advantage Windows workstation, using FuncTool 2 software
(for MR perfusion) (GE Healthcare)
- LightSpeed CTscanner (4- to 16-slice detector) (GE
Healthcare)
- GE Advantage Windows workstation, using Perfusion 2 software
(for CT perfusion) (GE Healthcare)