Advances in CT Technology and Contrast Propel Noninvasive Angiography

This article discusses the advances in Computed Tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) due the introduction of multidetector scanners and improvements in scan rotation speeds. Also discussed timing of contrast and image acquisition and future applications.

COMMENTS comments

Share your thoughts.
Post a comment →
Read Comments(0) →
Article Tools Sponsored By
Loading...

Dennis Foley, MD Director, Section of Digital Imaging, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

The introduction of helical technology in the late 1980s revolutionized computed tomography and made noninvasive CT angiography (CTA) a reality. Multidetector scanners and improvements in scan rotation speeds have had nearly as profound an influence, making it possible to image the vasculature more quickly and with thinner slices, thus improving both temporal and spatial resolution. 1

Vascular coverage depends on several factors, including the number of detectors, detector collimation, beam width, pitch, and scan rotation speed. In general, CTA is optimized by coupling the thinnest possible image slices with the table speed needed to cover the targeted cephalocaudad dimension during the first circulation of a bolus of contrast media.

At the Medical College of Wisconsin, we use a 4-slice General Electric LightSpeed CT scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). A beam width of 5 mm and a detector collimation of 1.25 mm produce the thinnest possible image slices. Using a pitch of 6 and a scan rotation speed of 0.5 seconds, it is possible to achieve a coverage speed of 15 mm/sec. Image acquisition can be modified to account for varying requirements in the amount of coverage needed and the speed with which images must be acquired. By doubling detector collimation to 2.5 mm and beam width to 10 mm, for example, it is possible to cover 30 mm/sec.

Timing of Contrast and Image Acquisition

It is important that image acquisition be timed to correspond with the first circulation of contrast, based on a test mini-bolus; that the duration of the acquisition interval match that of the injection interval; and that the intra- arterial iodine concentration produce an arterial attenuation of 250 to 300 Hounsfield units (HU) throughout the full sequence of the acquisition. 1 Bolus-tracking software may one day be fast enough to precisely match acquisition interval to injection interval but, in my opinion, that is not the case today.

The acquisition interval depends not only on contrast circulation time but also on scanner performance. Figure 1 shows how an improvement in scan rotation speed from 0.8 seconds to 0.5 seconds reduces the image acquisition interval from 30 seconds to 20 seconds in an aortoiliac CT arteriogram encompassing approximately 30 cm of cephalocaudad coverage. The injection interval is similarly reduced.

Breathhold capacity is another factor to consider in determining the image acquisition interval; however, most patients can easily accommodate the 20- to 30-second breathhold typically required for CTA.

More Channels

There are many potential advantages of scanning with more than 4 channels. Among these are increased flexibility, the opportunity to balance the competing demands of speed and resolution, and the ability to reduce the contrast load.

In aortoiliac CTA, just as reducing scan rotation speed from 0.8 seconds to 0.5 seconds on a 4-slice scanner produces a 50 mL savings in contrast, imaging on an 8-slice scanner while maintaining detector collimation constant enables a further reduction in both injection and acquisition intervals, and an additional 50-mL reduction in contrast load (Figure 1C).

In a scan of a potential kidney donor, Figure 2 demonstrates clear definition of the renal arteries from the aortic ostium to the renal hilum. The image was acquired with an 8-channel scanner, following injection of 50 mL of contrast media. The contrast material in the renal collecting system reflects the preliminary mini-bolus.

Thoracoabdominal aortic CTA (Figure 3) provides an example of how an increased number of detector channels enables improvements in longitudinal resolution. With a cephalocaudad target coverage of 55 to 60 cm, a 4-detector scanner with a scan rotation speed of 0.5 seconds uses a 2.5-mm detector collimation and a beam width of 10 mm. Contrast is delivered at 5 mL/sec for 20 seconds, for a total of 100 mL. When an 8-detector scanner is used, the injection and acquisition intervals remain the same, as do the beam width and scan rotation speed. Detector collimation is reduced from 2.5 mm to 1.25 mm, however, improving longitudinal resolution. The resulting 3-dimensional image is shown in Figure 4.

The next advance in helical CT technology will be the introduction of scanners with 16 channels. These advanced scanners will enable the acquisition of slices as thin as 0.625 mm. One result will be a clear improvement in spatial resolution, as shown in Figure 5.

Future Applications

As a result of technological ad-vances in CT scanners, CT angiography is capable not only of evaluating the thoracoabdominal aorta and proximal abdominal visceral branch vessels, but also of improving the definition of vessels within such organs as the kidney, liver, and pancreas. Additional applications include angioportography; abdominal visceral imaging to detect visceral pathology, such as pancreatic lesions and hyper- and hypovascular liver lesions; and renal venography.

Under such circumstances, iodine load becomes an important consideration, as does imaging of various circulatory phases. In hepatic and pancreatic imaging, a 42-gram iodine load is necessary to acquire high-quality images not only in the venous phase, but subsequently in the parenchymal phase as well. 3,4 Similarly, in renal imaging, the desire to reduce the contrast load must be tempered by the need for venous imaging and for demonstrating pathology in the abdominal viscera. Figure 6 demonstrates angioportography in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma of the right hepatic lobe involving the right portal vein. A cut-off of the right portal vein is clearly delineated on venous phase imaging.

Even so, studies that produce first-pass images with excellent delineation of the hepatic arteries may only partly visualize small-vessel neovasculature in focal liver lesions. It is probably not yet possible to demonstrate abnormal vascularity within focal liver lesions as well as could be done with selective hepatic arteriography.

When CT is used to evaluate pulmonary embolism, the contrast load is determined by the need for indirect CT venography. The contrast injection interval extends well beyond
the acquisition interval for the pulmonary arterial phase, so that studies can be obtained at 2.5 to 3 minutes after injection of the peripheral veins (Figure 7).

Conclusion

As radiologists begin to perform CT angiography on scanners with 8 or more detector channels, imaging will become faster and resolution better. The contrast load, at least for arterial imaging, can be reduced. Under certain instances, the volume of contrast material used in CTA will be
as little as 40 to 50 mL, approximating the amount of gadolinium used for magnetic resonance angiography. Aortoiliac CT angiography, as discussed earlier, is one example.

Practical considerations related to CT angiography must be taken into account as well, among them, workflow, workstation design, and improvements in software for three-dimensional display. *

0 Comments

Add Comment

Text Only 2000 character limit

Page 1 of 1