Increasingly, innovation in medical imaging is originating from entrepreneurial companies, yet there equity capital needs are dramatically under-served. Skilled, active investors increase the potential value of these companies by providing needed services and expertise, in addition to capital. The authors review the relevant trends in this area of venture capital investment.
Dr. Carvlin and Dr. Schilling are General Partners, and Mr.
McPhee is a Managing General Partner with Mi3 Venture Capital,
Wellesley, MA.
In 382 BC, Hippocrates accurately summarized the arduous but
honorable labor of the radiologist when he observed, "Life is
short, the art long, opportunity fleeting, experience fallacious,
judgment difficult." These same comments could describe the work of
the venture capitalist in healthcare equally well.
The delivery of medical imaging services in the United States
comprises approximately 10% of the $1 trillion in U.S. healthcare
expenditures, or roughly 1.5% of the GNP. As most harried
radiologists can attest, the volume of medical imaging procedures
is increasing at a rate twice that of healthcare procedures
overall. Furthermore, the type and complexity of medical imaging
services are growing and changing as new discoveries in the life
sciences and digital and imaging technologies are integrated into
daily clinical practice. In the 1970s and 1980s, the repertoire of
imaging modalities was expanded dramatically, with the consequence
that one-third to one-half of the imaging procedures performed in a
busy hospital-based practice today were not even available at the
time that man first walked on the moon. Today, medical imaging is
used routinely to guide intervention, monitor response to therapy,
and select more appropriate treatment. In these areas, medical
imaging is achieving the same degree of precision, relatively low
cost, and favorable patient outcomes characteristic of its use in
diagnosis.
While the larger equipment, and pharmaceutical and medical
product companies have received much of the credit for past
innovation in medical imaging, increasingly, innovation is
originating from visionary, entrepreneurial companies. These
companies share many attributes with the prototypical, Silicon
Valley, high-technology start-up company. The companies are small,
the ideas and technologies are innovative but unproven, the teams
are inexpert operationally, and each one has a persistent, pressing
need for capital. These prototypical high-tech start-ups have
turned to venture capitalists (VCs) to meet part or all of their
funding needs. In 1999 alone, venture capital funds invested more
than $50 billion into entrepreneurial companies with software,
business services, new media, networking and equipment, with
retailing and distribution receiving the lion's share of the money
(figure 1). These types of investments, while highly risky, earned
an impressive return of 143%.
Historically, almost 25% of venture capital was deployed into
the healthcare sector. In the "dot-com" crazed atmosphere of the
late 1990s, however, this level of investment dropped to an
all-time low of 11%. For the most part, the equity capital needs of
entrepreneurial companies in healthcare, generally, and medical
imaging, specifically, are dramatically under-served. Furthermore,
these young companies have been unable to ally themselves with
skilled, active investors, those that can provide not only the
capital but also the sophisticated managerial, technical, and
marketing expertise necessary for success.
Why are most VCs not willing to invest in medical imaging?
That venture capitalists have chosen to redirect their
investments from healthcare is in part rational and in part
irrational. Healthcare is largely thought of as an "old economy"
industry, one that is strapped with regulations that tend to make
the development of new, innovative products a lengthy, expensive,
and uncertain enterprise. The adoption of innovative products is
often slow, particularly when their use requires healthcare
customers, primarily physicians, to change their behavior. Finally,
the science and technology of medical imaging is exceedingly
complex and not well understood by mainstream venture capitalists.
For these reasons, a large number of investment dollars have fled
from healthcare into sectors that appeared to offer larger returns
in less time and with less risk. Pharmaceutical companies, medical
device companies, and equipment companies fell out of favor with
Wall Street while the telecommunications and Internet companies
have enjoyed unprecedented (some would say ill considered) levels
of investment.
Why are a few VCs willing to invest in medical imaging?
Contrary to the prevailing sentiment regarding investments in
healthcare and medical imaging companies, there are a number of
reasons to believe that this sector offers good or even
extraordinary investment opportunities. Medical imaging is poised
to undergo a period of rapid and, in some cases, even disruptive
innovation. This kind of innovation, seen in the 1970s and 1980s,
is characterized by the introduction of new technologies,
proliferation of competitors, and eventual standardization and
consolidation. From a venture capitalist's perspective, the factors
critical to investing successfully in this evolving environment
are: having an intimate understanding of medical imaging; finding
these companies early (while they are still affordable); and
understanding the impact the innovative products and services are
likely to have in the healthcare marketplace. Finally, the forces
that are reforming the healthcare industry are also helping to
create conditions under which entrepreneurial companies can
flourish (figure 2).
Market pressures are forcing all segments of healthcare to
simultaneously reduce costs and increase quality of outcomes. This
is true not only in the practice of medicine but also in the
practice of business. Many larger companies routinely outsource
their innovation, that is, large entities purchase services and
technologies from small, innovative companies that can function
more cost-effectively. A second trend is the "digital revolution"
(i.e., the impact of the Internet, ubiquitous bandwidth, increasing
computer capacity, and radically declining storage costs on
healthcare information systems), with its implications for reducing
costs by improving productivity. A final trend is the
"life-sciences revolution," scientific breakthroughs that are
occurring at a rapid rate in molecular biology, genomics,
proteomics, and ultimately phenomics.
First trend--Market pressures
In the last few years, healthcare costs had been contained by
the rise of HMOs and by Medicare's slashing of reimbursements. This
cost containment has proven not to be sustainable, however. As
costs have begun to rise again, there is enormous pressure to find
new ways to reduce them. Baby boomers represent the largest and
most powerful healthcare customer group in U.S. history, a group
determined to maintain or even improve their quality of life. They
are sophisticated consumers who will actively seek out healthcare
services and products and will find out which ones achieve the
desired outcomes. HMOs and provider organizations intent on
ensuring that medical services are worth their price will support
them in this endeavor. New imaging products and services can be
used not only to improve outcomes, but also to demonstrate proof of
these outcomes in the form of performance-related databases and
decision support technology.
Second trend Digital revolution
As a whole, the healthcare industry lags far behind most other
similarly sized industries in its use of information systems.
Healthcare organizations and clinicians typically do not have the
systems required to determine whether they are managing care
efficiently. They need decision support systems to document the
value of reducing utilization and standardizing clinical
decision-making. Imaging can play a significant role in enabling
these information systems. Medical imaging handles more data and
information in digital form than any other discipline in
healthcare. In addition to its purely medical uses, imaging
technology is also a critical part of healthcare information
systems, the computerized communications linking all the players in
healthcare networks: payers, providers, physicians, and
patients.
In the digital revolution, the reduction of all information
types to the digital common denominator foreshadows new approaches
to medicine. The resulting structural reorganization of healthcare
will spawn not only new market leaders, but also entirely new
technologies and markets. The impending discontinuity represents
great investment opportunities.
Third trend--Life science revolution
Medical imaging is an early adopter and extensive user of
advanced technologies. Nowhere is this more evident than in the
application of genomics and proteomics. Knowledge gained through
recent advances in biotechnology has extended the ability of
medical imaging to identify and characterize states of health and
disease. Concomitant improvements in the sensitivity, specificity,
accuracy, spatial, temporal, and contrast resolution, achieved
through innovation in imaging hardware and software, provide
enhanced capabilities. Imaging now can assess, in a noninvasive and
nondestructive manner, the physical expression of the genome at
levels ranging from the whole body, to organs, tissues, cells, and
individual molecules.
Where are the investment opportunities to be found in medical
imaging?
The medical imaging sector extends well beyond the traditional
boundaries of diagnostic radiology. It cuts across the investment
categories of biotechnology, healthcare services, medical devices,
and information systems/e-health (figure 3). This "new" imaging
sector has been created by the application of genomics, computer
technologies, communications infrastructure, and analytic tools to
classic radiological procedures. It includes designing, producing,
marketing, delivering, and supporting healthcare imaging-related
products and services. The sector also includes all the
technologies that allow images to be created, acquired, stored,
manipulated, transmitted, and interpreted. Early-stage companies in
medical imaging are developing innovative products and services
that transcend the "traditional" categories of venture capital
investment.
Conclusion
There are a large and growing number of new medical imaging
ventures that are striving to produce the innovative products and
services that will provide higher quality healthcare at lower
costs. The skilled, active investor amplifies the potential value
of these ventures by meeting more than the entrepreneur's
persistent, pressing need for capital. Venture capitalists now
provide entrepreneurs with incubator services ranging from office
and laboratory space, to managerial expertise, to information
technology support, to a full range of business infrastructure
activities. In his Aphorisms, Hippocrates displays a keen
understanding of medicine and human nature. He wrote: "Healing is a
matter of time, but it is sometimes also a matter of opportunity."
So also is the nurturing of innovation in medical imaging. AR