Though the use of gallium-67 in the evaluation of tumors has been limited, to some extent, by technological and physiologic factors, it has been most useful in the follow-up of known gallium acid lymphoma after radiation or chemotherapy. Ga-67 can distinguish between residual or recurrent tumor and fibrosis, and newer imaging techniques have increased its sensitivity and specificity. This article discusses the features and findings of the gallium scan in the evaluation of lymphoma.

Gallium-67 citrate (Ga-67) has been used in the localization of
multipletumors, most notably lymphoma, hepatocellular carcinoma,
and melanoma. Becauseits behavior is similar to that of the ferric
ion, it is accumulatedintracellularly within tumor cells. Like the
ferric ion, Ga-67 binds totransferrin and enters the extracellular
fluid space, after which it is boundby transferrin receptors on the
tumor cell surface. The levels of transferrinreceptor expression
tend to be increased with higher grade lymphomas,corresponding to
increased uptake by these tumors.1 Once Ga-67 been transportedinto
the cell, it is bound to the iron-binding proteins-ferritin
andlactoferrin-and ultimately stored within intracellular
lysosomes. Both of theseproteins are found in increased
concentration within tumor cells, accountingfor the increased
uptake of gallium in tumor versus normal cells. Thedistribution of
gallium within normal structures includes the liver, lacrimaland
salivary glands, spleen, bone, and bone marrow. Additionally, there
hasbeen significant activity noted within the bowel. During the
first 24 hoursfollowing injection, excretion is from the
genitourinary tract as well as thegastrointestinal tract; however,
this changes to primarily bowel excretionafter the first 24 hours.
The use of Ga-67 in the evaluation of tumors has been limited, to
some extent,by technological and physiologic factors. Early studies
have underestimated thesensitivity and specificity of gallium tumor
detection by the use of outdatedtechnologies. To a large degree,
these technological limitations have beenminimized with the advent
of SPECT imaging and improved imaging protocols.Recent studies have
demonstrated increased sensitivity and specificity with
theutilization of these newer imaging techniques.2,3
Physiological limitations have existed as well, and these continue
to causeproblems in the routine utilization of gallium for tumor
detection. Mostnotably, the significant uptake of gallium by the GI
tract has limited the useof this agent in the evaluation of
abdominal tumors. Some authors haveadvocated the use of cleansing
enemas prior to imaging. At our institution, wehave not found this
helpful and have found the irritation to the bowel by
thesepreparations offsets any advantage gained by their routine
use. Anotherphysiologic factor which has limited the routine use of
gallium has been thevaried uptake by tumor cells. While some tumors
demonstrate marked galliumavidity, other tumors of the same cell
type have not. Furthermore, the avidityof a metastatic lesion may
not reflect that of the original tumor mass.Nevertheless, clinical
applications for the use of gallium exist.
Perhaps the area in which gallium has been most useful is the
follow-up ofknown gallium avid lymphoma after radiation or
chemotherapy. Follow-up of knowntumor masses with CT, the commonly
accepted methodology, may demonstrateresidual mass at the site of
previously known lesions. While CT is unable todistinguish between
residual or recurrent tumor versus fibrosis, gallium isquite useful
in making this distinction. Non-active scar tissue (fibrosis)
willnot accumulate gallium, while recurrent or residual lymphoma
will. In patientswith complete remission, gallium imaging was
reported to be negative in 95% ofpatients, compared with 57% on CT
and 55% on chest radiographs.2,3 While only20% of patients may have
enlargement of the mediastinum, gallium scans haverevealed
increased tracer accumulation in 100% of the patients who
relapsed.Other studies have shown the specificity of gallium
imaging for residualdisease at 93% compared with 83% for MRI.4 This
distinction is further aided bythe initial acquisition of a
pre-treatment gallium scan to determine avidity.Clearly, the
implications of a negative gallium scan are less clear than thoseof
a positive gallium follow-up. Because of this, the follow-up
evaluationshould be done after definitive chemotherapy and
consolidation radiotherapy.
At our institution, a 10 mCi dose of Ga-67 is injected
intravenously, followedby planar imaging started at 48 hours.
Additional imaging is performed at 72and 96 hours, or longer, if
needed. SPECT imaging is performed, at the abovetimes, of those
areas most suspected of harboring viable lymphoma.
A negative scan may indicate the presence of scar or a change in
the avidity ofthe original tumor mass. While this finding does not
carry as clear aninterpretation as a positive scan, it is
supportive evidence of fibrosisfollowing radiation or chemotherapy.
Definitive diagnosis in this case willdepend upon needle biopsy,
which may be deferred to later follow-up based onthe clinical
presentation of the patient. Conversely, a positive
post-treatmentscan is consistent with a recurrent or residual
tumor. It should be noted thatthymic rebound causing benign
increased accumulation of gallium can occurduring or immediately
after chemotherapy and is one cause of false-positiveexaminations.
Other benign causes such as respiratory tract infections
andsarcoidosis also should be considered.
Images from two patients are included here. Figures 1A and 1B
demonstrate apatient with a positive CT scan and a negative gallium
scan, consistent withscar tissue. Figures 2A and 2B demonstrate a
patient with a positive CT and apositive gallium scan, consistent
with active disease. AR