This month’s installment of the Technology & Industry Section focuses on full-field digital mammography and its potential to replace film-based systems. Also, reports on the Society of Nuclear Medicine’s Annual Meeting feature advances in cardiovascular imaging and oncology.
Full-field digital mammography
As Trex Medical Corporation (Danbury, CT) awaits FDA clearance
for its full-field digital mammography (FFDM) device, the company
predicts that this technology will someday replace film-based
mammography as the gold standard for breast cancer detection. Until
that day arrives, FFDM will most likely be used side-by-side with
conventional mammography when it becomes available sometime in
1999.
Clinical trial evaluated more than 500 cases and 4000
images
Today, film-screen mammography has about 85% sensitivity, and
two-thirds of missed cancers are occult, said Melinda J. Staiger,
MD, director of breast imaging at Good Samaritan Hospital Medical
Center (West lslip, Long Island, NY). Dr. Staiger's institution was
one of three centers that conducted comparative studies
demonstrating that FFDM is clinically equivalent to film-screen
mammography, a requirement for FFDM to be granted 510(k) market
clearance by the FDA. The trial collected data from more than 500
cases and more than 4000 images.
"The digital mammograms I've seen preserve beautiful definition
of the external tissues, the skin, and the subcutaneous tissues we
frequently sacrifice in our [film-screen] techniques in order to
penetrate through very dense breast tissue," said Dr. Staiger.
"There's the possibility that digital mammography ultimately
will outperform film-screen mammography, but in the near term, it's
relatively simple to show they are equivalent," said Laurie L.
Fajardo, MD, professor of radiology and vice chair of research at
the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center (Charlottesville,
VA). "In the limited scope of this study, the imaging of patients
who have particularly dense breasts appears to be superior on
digital systems because signal-to-noise can be enhanced better than
with film-screen images," said Dr. Fajardo. "I believe that if
digital mammography does become widespread at some point in the
future, we will begin to appreciate earlier diagnosis and less
misdiagnosis with mammography, particularly in the radio-dense
patient population and the younger patient population," she
added.
"Greatest potential impact on management of breast
cancer"
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 1991 identified digital
mammography as "the most fertile territory for major advances in
x-ray detection and diagnosis of minimal breast cancers." The NCI
also predicted that digital mammography is "the evolving technology
with the greatest potential impact on management of breast cancer."
The technologic challenge for FFDM is to provide high-resolution,
high-contrast images with the lowest possible radiation dose to the
patient.
Postprocessing: contrast enhancement, computer-aided
diagnosis, tomography, and 3D
Digital mammography can provide more consistency than film, the
quality of which depends not only on image acquisition but on
chemical processing. In addition, FFDM features the potential of
postprocessing techniques to amplify subtle contrast differences in
suspicious regions of the breast tissue.
During clinical trials to evaluate FFDM, the ability to
manipulate mammographic images on the computer screen was a
novelty, noted Dr. Staiger. In the real world of clinical practice,
though, "we would fiddle around with contrast only for problem
cases," she said. For the average patient, it should only take
about 1 minute to read a mammogram, she explained, so it would not
make sense to take 5 minutes perfecting the contrast resolution for
each case.
Computer-aided diagnosis may also be possible with FFDM, serving
almost as a "second reader." The computer, for example, may
automatically draw a border around areas of abnormal contrast,
calling the radiologist's attention to suspicious regions. This
technology might be useful, for instance, in cases where the
radiologist is "seduced" by obvious findings. "Sometimes big
lesions can be missed when the focus is on looking for very small
lesions," noted Dr. Staiger. In the future, image reconstruction
techniques with FFDM may eventually offer tomographic or
three-dimensional breast images.
There may be up to l000 patterns of a normal breast, noted Dr.
Staiger, which makes breast imaging a different type of challenge
than imaging the brain, liver, lungs, heart, or other organs. Once
FFDM becomes available, mammographers will need to develop
algorithms for obtaining good images from dense breasts, fatty
breasts, and breasts with microcalcifications, she added.
"My impressions, my intuition, from what I've seen so far, is
that it's going to bring a lot of cancers to light in the mammogram
that might have been missed before," said Lawrence W. Bassett, MD,
FACR, professor of breast imaging at the Iris Cantor Center for
Breast Imaging, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School
of Medicine. "Although we thought it was going to be difficult to
use a larger image receptor, the technologist adapted to it quite
readily and, in fact, found it was no more difficult to position
than our conventional mammograms were," Dr. Bassett added.
Siemens Opdima® provides digital spot imaging today as
company plans for FFDM future
Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. (Iselin, NJ) offers the Opdima®, a
mammography digital spot imaging system for use with its MAMMOMAT®
3000 upright mammography unit. Radiologists and mammographers don't
have to wait for the future to take advantage of digital imaging,
according to Maria Di Palermo, mammography product manager at
Siemens. When film mammogram results prompt radiologists to request
additional spot views, they can do them with the Opdima system and
take advantage of postprocessing techniques for magnification,
contrast enhancement (window, level, and filters), and measurements
of small calcifications.
Opdima technology is based on a large-area spot charge-coupled
device (CCD) incorporated in a slim cassette that fits into the
standard object table of the MAMMOMAT 3000. "The digital spot
camera is wafer-thin, and fits in the same bucky as a film
cassette. Technologists can switch back and forth from film to
digital spot imaging with no trouble," said Ms. Di Palermo. "We
have the largest field of view available today for digital spot
imaging, 49 ¥ 85 mm," she added.
The Opdima represents the first time that Siemens is offering a
digital imaging system that can be used in mammography for
nonstereotactic applications. "We anticipate that this will become
an important tool for evaluation of suspected areas, and for
presurgical needle localization," said Ms. Di Palermo. Opdima is
available and deliverable in the United States and worldwide.
In addition, the company will probably have its investigational
full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system in clinical sites next
year for beta testing. There are many technical aspects of FFDM
that are still a challenge, noted Ms. Di Palermo. "Each FFDM image
is about 40 megabytes, so it takes a very sophisticated computer
system to handle the typical four views taken of one patient," she
explained. Mammographers will probably want the capability to
compare studies with baseline mammograms on the monitor, she
added.
Kodak signs 3-year agreement to provide mammography film
to Tenet Healthcare
Eastman Kodak Company (Rochester, NY) has a 3-year agreement to
be the sole supplier of mammography film products to Tenet
Healthcare Corporation, which owns 124 acute-care hospitals in 18
states. Tenet also operates a group purchasing organization,
BuyPower, which serves Tenet hospitals as well as 2000 independent
facilities.
Kodak agrees in August to acquire Imation
In August, Kodak agreed to acquire most of Imation Corp's
worldwide medical imaging business, including its DryView™ laser
imaging business. The terms call for Kodak to pay Imation $520
million in cash at closing. This acquisition will enable Kodak to
provide a broader portfolio of products worldwide, said the
company.
SNM 1998: Advances in cardiovascular imaging and
oncology
With new peptide and antibody radiopharmaceuticals on the
horizon, The Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) held its 45th Annual
Meeting June 7-11, 1998, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Advances in
oncology were focused on the expanding use of positron emission
tomography (PET) with fluorine-18 [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG).
Nuclear cardiology is compiling huge databases from thousands of
patients-proving the effectiveness of myocardial perfusion studies
in determining which patients to discharge from the emergency room
and in predicting the risk of future cardiac events.
99mTc-labeled peptide detects deep-vein thrombi
With a new radiopharmaceutical now under FDA review, physicians
can quickly differentiate between an active blood clot in the leg,
which poses life-threatening risk to the patient, and other types
of circulatory problems that are far less dangerous-and which
require very different medical treatments. Technetium-99m [99mTc]
apcitide (Acutect®, Diatide) is a radiolabeled peptide that targets
receptors on the cell surface of platelets that have become
activated in the blood-clotting process.
Nycomed Amersham to market/sell apcitide
Apcitide was developed by Diatide, Inc. (Londonderry, NH), a
company that specializes in radiolabeled peptides. Nycomed Amersham
(Princeton, NJ) will handle the marketing and sales of 99mTc
apcitide. In medical journal papers, apcitide is sometimes called
"P280."
"P280 has been shown in Phase III multicenter clinical trials to
have a relatively high diagnostic accuracy for deep-vein
thrombosis. We are planning to use it to distinguish between
recurrent deep-vein thrombosis and postphlebitic syndrome, which is
inflammation of the vein," said Raymond Taillefer, MD, director of
the Nuclear Medicine Department at Hospital Hôtel-Dieu de Montreal
(Québéc, Canada). "It is important to make this distinction because
deep-vein thrombosis is treated with anticoagulants, whereas
postphlebitic syndrome is treated with other types of drugs," said
Dr. Taillefer, who participated in clinical trials for
apcitide.
About 70% of patients with deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) are
asymptomatic. Furthermore, the signs and symptoms of DVT can be
nonspecific. Among patients who show typical symptoms-such as leg
swelling, warmth, calf pain and tenderness-only 30 to 40% actually
have DVT. It is important, therefore, to have an objective test
that clearly identifies acute DVT.
Differentiating acute from chronic DVT
If a blood clot is actively forming (acute thrombus), the
patient usually requires treatment with an anticoagulant, such as
heparin. The typical protocol is to hospitalize the patient for
several days to administer intravenous heparin, followed by 3
months of oral anticoagulants. On the other hand, if the blood clot
is a chronic thrombus that has already stabilized, the risk of
embolism is much lower, and the patient may not require
anticoagulants.
Some patients may undergo unnecessary anticoagulant therapy,
just to be on the safe side and prevent a possible pulmonary
embolism, because their physicians are not sure whether the
thrombus is active or chronic. Besides the cost of the
hospitalization and medication, anticoagulant therapy poses certain
risks, such as gastrointestinal tract bleeding or platelet
abnormalities. Therefore, any test that helps patients avoid
unnecessary use of anticoagulants would be clinically valuable.
Acute DVT may lead to pulmonary embolism
The most dangerous, potentially fatal consequence of DVT is a
possible pulmonary embolism. In the United States, an estimated 5
million patients experience one or more episodes of DVT each year,
leading to 500,000 annual cases of pulmonary embolism, resulting in
100,000 deaths per year.
"The advantage of apcitide is that we are actually looking at
active blood clotting with physiologic nuclear medicine images.
With anatomic images, provided by ultrasound and contrast x-ray
venography, we can see an anatomic abnormality that may or may not
be an active thrombus," said Robert F. Carretta, MD, director of
the Nuclear Medicine Department at Sutter Roseville Medical Center
(Roseville, CA).
"Another advantage of apcitide is that we can image the patient
shortly after injection and get the report to the referring
physician very quickly. It will not replace ultrasound, which is an
excellent screening procedure. But ultrasound has its limitations
in the calf veins, and often does not detect acute deep-vein
thrombosis below the knee," said Dr. Carretta, who also
participated in apcitide clinical trials.
Therapeutic antibody for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
A monoclonal antibody labeled with iodine-131 [131I] is being
evaluated by Coulter Pharmaceutical (Palo Alto, CA) as a
therapeutic agent for low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The anti-B1
antibody targets the CD20 B-lymphocyte antigen found on
non-Hodgkin's B-cells, as well as on some normal B-cells. The
unlabeled anti-B1 antibody and the 131I each have separate
therapeutic effects on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma B-cells.
During the first stage of treatment (dosimetric dose), two doses
are administered intravenously: a 60-minute infusion of unlabeled
antibody followed by a separate 20-minute infusion of 5 mCi of
131I-labeled antibody. Over the next few days, gamma camera scans
determine the 131I residence time, used to calculate the
patient-specific therapeutic dose, which is also administered in
separate "hot" and "cold" infusions. Patients are given oral iodine
supplements to block thyroid uptake of 131I.
Two Phase I/II clinical trials with 131I-anti-B1 antibody have
been completed. According to Coulter, in one trial of patients with
relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 42 of 59 patients
(71%) achieved either a complete or partial response (defined as
350% reduction in all measurable lesions with no new lesions). In
the other trial, 14 of 45 patients (31%) achieved complete response
and 13 patients (29%) achieved partial response. Side effects
included a transient flu-like syndrome and bone-marrow
suppression.
A Phase III trial is now underway.
PET predicts success of chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma
In another application of nuclear medicine for patients with
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, early evaluation with FDG-PET, after two or
three cycles of chemotherapy, may help to predict which patients
will succeed with the treatment (Abstract No. 580). [Abstracts are
published in the supplement to the May 1998 issue of J Nucl
Med.]
In a study of 20 patients, seven patients had abnormal PET scans
early in the course of chemotherapy: four did not achieve complete
remission and showed signs of disease recurrence within 4 to 15
months of diagnosis; two achieved complete remission, but relapsed
at 12 and 20 months; and one remained in complete remission for 30
months. Five of these patients died. Of the 13 patients who had
normal FDG-PET scans, eleven remained in complete remission for up
to 36 months after diagnosis; two relapsed (at 6 and 14 months) and
died of Iymphoma. "Patients with early response to chemotherapy
[indicated by a normal FDG PET scan after 2 or 3 cycles of
chemotherapy] have a high probability of progression-free
survival," said Pierre M. Rigo, MD, professor and director of the
Nuclear Medicine Division at University Hospital (Liège,
Belgium).
Octreotide scan improves staging of Hodgkin's
disease
A prospective study of 126 patients previously untreated for
Hodgkin's disease found that nuclear medicine imaging with
indium-111 [111In] octreotide (OctreoScan®, Mallinckrodt) detected
disseminated disease (Stage III or IV, spread to organs or in lymph
nodes at both sides of the diaphragm) in a significant proportion
of patients who had been classified as Stage I or II (disease
confined to lymph nodes at one side of the diaphragm) by standard
staging techniques (Abstract No. 147). In some cases, these newly
detected lesions were outside the subtotal nodal irradiation field,
which is the standard treatment for Hodgkin's disease patients with
a favorable prognosis. "These patients have a high probability of
relapse," said Elly Lugtenburg, MD, of the Department of
Hematology, University Hospital Rotterdam (The Netherlands).
Instead of radiotherapy aimed at the diseased lymph node, patients
who are actually at Stage III or IV should be treated with
chemotherapy.
FDG-PET detects colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with
normal CEA levels
Results of one study may cause some oncologists to reassess the
value of tumor markers as a screening test for recurrent colorectal
cancer (Abstract No. 531). In a study of 45 patients, whole-body
FDG-PET correctly identified lesions in 16 of 17 (94%) patients
with normal CEA and CA 19-9 levels. In addition, FDG-PET correctly
diagnosed up to 95% of lesions in patients with elevated CEA and CA
19-9 levels. Typically, a rise in plasma levels of tumor markers is
one reason to refer a patient to FDG-PET scanning for identifying
recurrent colorectal cancer.
"Our data indicate that normal tumor marker levels do not
exclude the presence of malignant tissue," said Hans Bender, MD,
associate professor of nuclear medicine at the University of Bonn
(Germany). "If there are any other indications of tumor recurrence,
such as lesions detected by CT or ultrasound, pain reported by the
patient, etc., I would recommend whole-body FDG-PET independent of
CFA or CA 19-9 levels," said Dr. Bender. High glucose uptake with
FDG is typical of tumor recurrence, he explained, whereas lack of
glucose uptake would indicate scar tissue. However, it is too early
to recommend that FDG-PET replace tumor markers as a screening
method. Dr. Bender said he would like to see this question
addressed in a future prospective study with a much larger patient
population.
FDG-PET for staging head and neck cancer
For patients with squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck,
PDG-PET may be more accurate than other imaging tests, and can help
steer patients toward the most appropriate treatment.
One study of 51 patients, conducted at the Northern California
PET Imaging Center and several California medical centers, found
that PET was more accurate than x-ray computed tomography (CT) and
magnetic resonance (MR) for the diagnosis of local and regional
recurrence of disease (Abstract No. 479). In addition, PET commonly
detected unsuspected distant disease. "Pretreatment imaging with
FDG-PET avoids the morbidity and cost of attempted curative surgery
or radiotherapy in patients with undiagnosed distant recurrences,"
said Elma Abella-Columna, MD, a clinical fellow at the Northern
California PET Imaging Center (Sacramento). "These patients may be
candidates for chemotherapy," she added.
In the second study of 44 patients, presented by researchers
from the Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center (Missouri)
sequential FDG-PET (obtained at 2 and 10 months after therapy) was
evaluated for detection of recurrent head and neck cancer (Abstract
No. 478). "More accurate detection of recurrence may provide ways
of improving survival," said Val J. Lowe, MD, director of PET at
Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center. His group found that
"PET can detect head-and-neck tumor recurrence when it may be
undetectable by other clinical methods."
Nuclear cardiology: Cost-effective in ER patients with
chest pain
A study reported that using nuclear cardiology tests in a
dedicated chest-pain center to treat emergency patients reduced the
yearly rate of myocardial infarction (MI) from 1.8% to 0.1% in
outpatients discharged with a principal diagnosis of nonspecific
chest pain. Results of this 2-year study of 6,548 patients were
presented by investigators from The Miami Cardiac and Vascular
Institute and Baptist Hospital (Miami, FL) and Emory University
School of Medicine (Atlanta) (Abstract No. 541).
The cost per diagnosis (of nonspecific chest pain) was $606
prior to adding nuclear cardiology-specifically, myocardial
perfusion imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT)-to the protocol. With SPECT in the protocol, the cost of
this diagnosis increased to $1,676. The total cost of SPECT in this
patient population, divided by the number of additional MIs
detected-preventing those patients from being sent home with a
hidden heart attack-was $59,400. However, when factoring in the
cost of missing an MI, estimated at $50,000, the cost of SPECT per
additional MI detected was only $9,400.
"With a minimum estimated likelihood of mortality from missed MI
of 16%, the maximum cost to save a life is only $59,000," noted
Jack A. Ziffer, MD, PhD, director of the Cardiac Imaging Institute.
"In this year of constrained resources, nuclear cardiology can play
a central role in improving patient outcomes, and do it
cost-effectively, in the clinical pathways of acute ischemic heart
disease," he added.