In the evaluation of small extremity joints such as the elbow and wrist, MR has demonstrated that it is an ideal imaging modality, due to its high contrast and direct multiplanar capabilities. With recent advances in software and new coil designs, detailed evaluation of ligaments, tendons, and cartilage can easily be performed.
In the evaluation of small extremity joints such as the elbow
and wrist, MR has demonstrated that it is an ideal imaging
modality, due to its high contrast and direct multiplanar
capabilities. With recent advances in software and new surface coil
designs, detailed evaluation of ligaments, tendons, and cartilage
can easily be performed.
Volumetric gradient-recalled echo imaging allows for thin
section imaging as well as image reconstruction in multiple planes,
which can be extremely useful in patients who cannot maintain rigid
positioning during the MR examination.
Elbow and wrist pain are common presenting complaints in
patients who are referred to orthopaedic surgeons. While the
underlying diagnoses often can be made on clinical assessment, more
difficult diagnoses, such as distinction between elbow ulnar
collateral ligament and flexor tendon pathology, are difficult to
discern. In addition, the extent of injury cannot always be
accurately assessed. MRI is useful for both establishing the
correct diagnosis and for evaluating extent of injury, which aids
in the surgical planning of patients refractory to conservative
treatment. Dedicated cartilage pulse sequences also may disclose
clinically unsuspected chondral injury as the underlying cause of
persistent pain.
The elbow
The elbow is a synovial hinge joint between the trochlea and the
capitellum of the humerus, articulating with the trochlea notch of
the olecranon and the radial head.1 The lateral collateral ligament
is a single band with its apex attached to the lateral epicondyle
of the humerus and its base attached to the upper margin of the
ulnar band of the lateral collateral ligament.1 The ulnar band of
the lateral collateral ligament crosses posterior to the radial
neck and inserts on the supinator crest of the ulna. The ulnar band
of the lateral collateral ligament, as well as the anterior band of
the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament, are primary
ligamentous stabilizers of the elbow. Important musculotendinous
origins of the lateral elbow include the extensor carpi radialis
brevis and extensor carpi radialis longus tendons. These tendons
course lateral to the lateral collateral ligament, originating from
the lateral epicondyle of the humerus (figure 1).
The medial collateral ligament is composed of anterior and
posterior oblique bundles originating from the medial epicondyle of
the humerus, and a transverse bundle extending between the coronoid
and the tip of the olecranon.2 The stronger anterior bundle inserts
into the medial aspect of the coronoid process of the ulna, with
the weaker, thinner, and more variable posterior bundle inserting
into the posteromedial aspect of the olecranon.3 The anterior
bundle is divided into anterior and posterior bands and is best
visualized with the elbow in extension.2 The posterior bundle is
best visualized with the elbow in flexion. Important
musculotendinous origins of the medial elbow include the common
flexor and pronator tendons, which originate from the medial
epicondyle. These include the flexor carpi radialis, flexor
digitorum superficialis, pronator teres, palmaris longus, and
flexor carpiulnaris tendons.
MR imaging
The inherent obliquity of the elbow joint requires proper
patient positioning to maximize optional visualization of tendon
and ligament anatomy. To maximize patient comfort and thereby
minimize motion, we evaluate the elbow with the patient in a supine
position, with the elbow at the side. We favor this position over
the "hand-over-the-head" position. To achieve coronal images, the
forearm is supinated and a 5-inch receive-only surface coil or
phase-array shoulder coil is placed anteriorly over the elbow.
Coronal 3D volumetric gradient-recalled echo or multiplanar
gradient-recalled echo technique is initially performed, as the
long axis of the ligaments and tendons are most easily assessed in
this plane. Specific pulse sequence parameters include thin (1.4 to
1.6 mm) slices, field-of-view of 11 to 13 cm, with matrices of 256
¥ 192 or 256 ¥ 256. To assess cartilage, additional coronal, axial,
and sagittal higher resolution (matrices of 512 ¥ 384 or 512 ¥ 256)
fast spin echo images also are obtained. The elbow should be imaged
in extension unless there is direct interest in the posterior
bundle of the medial collateral ligament, in which case additional
flexion images are performed. We also chose to image the elbow in
the direct coronal plane without intraarticular gadolinium. Other
authors have suggested imaging in a 20° posterior oblique coronal
plane in relation to the humeral shaft with the elbow extended and,
optimally, in a coronal plane aligned with the humeral shaft with
the elbow slightly flexed.4 This is because the collateral
ligaments course in an approximately 15 to 20° posterior oblique
fashion. These same authors assert that intraarticular gadolinium
can be useful for delineating the undersurface of normal and
abnormal ligaments and for evaluating partial tears at these
sites.4 However, at our institution, we have not found
intraarticular contrast necessary for routine MR imaging of the
elbow.
Lateral elbow
Lateral epicondylitis, also known as "tennis elbow," is a common
cause of lateral elbow pain, the diagnosis of which is typically
evident on clinical examination. Repetitive trauma to the extensor
tendons leads to degeneration and microtears. Histopathologically,
there is mucoid degeneration, disruption of collagen fibers, and
neovascularization at the origin of the common extensor tendons,
which correlate to the signal hyperintensity seen on MR imaging.5
These MR findings are in agreement with previous histopathologic
reports, demonstrating disrupted collagen fibers with fibroblastic
and vascular ingrowth, but no evidence of an inflammatory
component.6
MR imaging of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis typically
demonstrates signal hyperintensity at the origin of the extensor
carpi radialis brevis tendon, with separation between the extensor
tendons and lateral collateral ligament (figure 2).5 This may
progress to complete or partial disruption of the extensor carpi
radialis brevis and extensor carpi radialis longus tendons, as well
as the lateral collateral ligament. MR imaging evaluates the extent
of degeneration, which will help to determine whether surgery
involves simple débridement or débridement and repair.
Medial elbow
Medial elbow pain is more difficult to evaluate clinically, as
it may be due to medial epicondylitis, medial collateral ligament
injury, ulnar nerve injury, or posteromedial impingement. MR
imaging has been found to be quite useful in determining site and
extent of injury, again directly influencing patient
management.
Medial epicondylitis, also known as "pitcher's" or "golfer's
elbow," is caused by repetitive strain on the common
flexor/pronator muscle group that originates from the medial
epicondyle.2 Signal hyperintensity is noted at the origin of the
common flexor/pronator muscle group, again with the possible
findings of degeneration, partial tear, or complete disruption of
the medial epicondyle.
Injuries to the medial collateral ligament occur as increased
valgus stress is placed upon the elbow. Valgus stress rarely
injures the flexor forearm muscles, as these are more resistant to
stress than the ligamentous insertions.2 MR imaging demonstrates
foci of abnormal signal intensity and morphologic alteration of the
normally hypointense medial collateral ligament.7 Disruption may
occur at the humeral or ulnar insertion and may be complete or
partial (figure 3). One must be careful not to interpret the normal
synovial recess deep to an intact medial collateral ligament as
abnormal signal intensity and evidence of partial tear.2 Repetitive
valgus stress also may lead to chronic medial collateral ligament
tears and a reparative response, which appears as thickening of the
ligament and loss of the normal hypointense signal (figure 4).
Extreme valgus load also may result in osteochondral impact
injury of the capitellum, rupture of the posterior capsule, and
ulnar nerve entrapment (figures 3,5). Cartilage wear over the
humeral ulnar articulation is not uncommon (figure 6). However, it
is important not to interpret the overhanging edges of the
capitellum (pseudodefect of capitellum) as a site of osteochondral
impaction injury on the sagittal or coronal sequences.8
In the pediatric athlete, fat suppressed gradient-recalled echo
imaging can detect physeal injury to the medial epicondylar
apophysis, which is caused by repetitive valgus stress loading of
the developing joint (figure 7).2 Subtle injuries of the medial
collateral ligament may occur if partial fusion of the apophysis
has already occurred (figure 8). Chronic nonunions also may be
assessed.
Posterolateral rotatory instability
The ulnar band of the lateral collateral ligament, as stated
above, is an important primary stabilizer of the elbow joint. The
ulnar band is located at the posterior margin of the
radiocapitellar joint and courses from the lateral epicondyle to
the supinator crest of the ulna. Tears of the ulnar band allow for
rotatory subluxation of the ulna in forearm supination, allowing
the radial head to subluxate inferior to the capitellum.9 This
clinical entity is called posterolateral rotatory instability of
the elbow and it falls within the spectrum of elbow instability
prior to complete dislocation.10 Plain radiographs are usually
nondiagnostic and subluxation and characteristic reduction may not
be demonstrated clinically in the absence of examination under
anesthesia. Given the importance of an intact ulnar band of the
lateral collateral ligament in stabilization of the elbow joint,
the detail of MR imaging serves as an accurate, noninvasive
diagnostic tool (figures 9,10).
The wrist
MR imaging of the wrist is becoming a more frequently performed
examination. Commonly requested exams include the evaluation of the
triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), intrinsic scapholunate
and lunotriquetral interosseous ligaments, and occult ganglia of
the wrist. MR also is useful in the assessment of tendinopathy,
lesions of the carpal tunnel, and cartilaginous injury.
MR imaging
At our institution, MR examination of the wrist is performed
with the patient in the supine position and the affected hand at
the side, with the forearm in full pronation. Imaging is done using
a quadrature design wrist surface coil. Thin slice (1 mm), high
resolution (8 cm field-of-view, 256 ¥ 256 matrix) coronal
volumetric gradient-recalled echo images, as well as fast spin echo
axial, coronal, and sagittal images, are obtained for the
examination.
Triangular fibrocartilage complex
The TFCC is a composite of ligamentous and fibrocartilaginous
tissue that binds the ulnar aspect of the radius to the ulna and
ulnar carpus.11 It is a major stabilizer of the radioulnar and
ulnocarpal joints. This complex consists of the volar and dorsal
radioulnar ligaments, the articular disc, the meniscal homologue,
the ulnolunate and ulnotriquetral ligaments, and the extensor carpi
ulnaris tendon sheath.11 The articular disc has a broad attachment
to the sigmoid notch of the radius and, along with the remainder of
the TFCC complex, has a striated fascicular attachment to the ulna
(figure 11). This ulnar attachment is demonstrated as two distinct
groups of fascicles, one inserting at the tip of the ulnar styloid
process and the other inserting at the base of the ulnar styloid
process .11 Less commonly, the ulnar attachment is demonstrated as
a band of fascicles attaching along the entire length of the ulnar
styloid process. Due to the variable insertion of the TFCC onto the
ulna, familiarity with this anatomy is important in order to avoid
misdiagnosis of anatomic variation as disc pathology.12,15 Despite
this variable anatomy, a recent series of 77 patients noted 97%
accuracy in the detection of tear and 92% accuracy in the
localization of tear, 57% of which were ulnar in location.16 One
also must be careful not to interpret the high signal intensity
fluid in the prestyloid recess or adjacent synovial proliferation
as a tear at the ulnar insertion of the TFCC.
Injury to the TFCC is a common cause of ulnar wrist pain. Palmer
proposed a classification system for TFCC lesions based upon cause
(degeneration or traumatic), location, and extent of injury to the
articular disc.13 Degenerative tears of the articular disc are more
common than traumatic tears; they are more commonly demonstrated at
the central portion of the articular disc, with thinning of the
adjacent intact fibrocartilage. Traumatic tears have previously
been reported to be more common within the central or radial aspect
of the articular disc (figure 12).14,15 However, more recent
studies demonstrate that the ulnar portion of the articular disc
may be the more common location.16 The radial and central aspects
of the articular disc are relatively hypovascular, as only the
outer 10 to 40% of the articular disc receives direct blood
supply.17 This directly influences healing, with radial-side tears
usually requiring surgical débridement. MRI has proven to be an
excellent modality for detection of injury to the articular disc,
prompting either direct repair or débridement, as indicated.
MR imaging also is useful in its ability to evaluate other
common differential diagnoses of wrist pain.14 These include
tendinopathy, ulnar neuropathy, ulnar artery thrombosis, occult
fracture, ganglion formation, and distal radioulnar joint ligament
tears. Disruption of the dorsal and/or palmar distal radioulnar
ligaments may be associated with injury to the articular disc of
the TFCC. The thick dorsal and palmar ligaments extend from the
dorsal and palmar rim of the sigmoid notch of the radius to the
fovea and base of the ulnar styloid process.15 The primary function
of these ligaments is to prevent distal radioulnar joint
subluxation. Evaluation of the distal radioulnar joint ligament can
be performed when noting increased signal intensity and disruption
of ligament fibers on coronal gradient-recalled echo images, as
well as altered relationship of alignment of the distal radius and
ulna in pronation on fast spin echo axial images (figure 13). MR
imaging can therefore confirm the clinical suspicion of distal
radioulnar joint subluxation.
Intrinsic ligaments
Another common indication for MR imaging of the wrist is the
evaluation of intrinsic scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligament
instability in patients with normal plain radiographs and strong
clinical suspicion for injury. The scapholunate ligament connects
the volar, proximal, and dorsal border of the ulnar aspect of the
scaphoid bone to the radial border of the lunate bone.18 Injury to
the scapholunate ligament leads to scapholunate instability, which
can progress to scapholunate dissociation and rotary subluxation of
the scaphoid.19 However, controversy exists as to the clinical
significance of lesions in various anatomic portions of the
scapholunate ligament. Because it has been reported that only tears
extending to the dorsal aspect of the ligament or tears involving
the entire ligament affect scapholunate joint stability,18,19 MRI
is crucial in detecting not only the tear itself, but the location
and extent of the tear (figure 14). Therefore, one must be familiar
with the variable shape, signal intensity, and features of
attachment to adjacent cartilage or bone of the different portions
of the scapholunate ligament, as this directly influences
management of these lesions.18 Evaluation of tears of the
lunotriquetral ligament also requires knowledge of the varied shape
and signal intensity that this ligament can display.20
Carpal bones
MR imaging is sensitive and specific for evaluation of fracture.
The most common indication in the wrist is for radiographically
occult fractures of the scaphoid, and in this setting, an
additional coronal fat suppression technique is required. Increased
signal intensity on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images and
a well demarcated fracture line are seen in the scaphoid. MR
imaging also is commonly used for evaluation of degree of collapse
and marrow viability in patients with Kienbock's disease (figure
15). In both cases, associated injury or degeneration of adjacent
cartilage can be assessed, which in turn influences decisions
concerning wrist débridement, partial carpectomy, and fusion.
Carpal tunnel
Previously, MR imaging also was performed for evaluation of
carpal tunnel syndrome. Recent reports, however, have demonstrated
that most of the reported MR imaging signs of carpal tunnel
syndrome are nonspecific, as they also have been found in
asymptomatic volunteers.21 The more statistically significant signs
of carpal tunnel syndrome include flexor retinacular bowing and
flexor tenosynovitis.21 In symptomatic patients, compressive
soft-tissue masses, such as ganglion cyst of the carpal tunnel
(figure 16), tenosynovitis of the flexor tendon sheaths and, less
likely, tumor of the median nerve, may be seen. In patients status
post-carpal tunnel release with persistent symptoms, MRI also may
disclose the relative integrity of the flexor retinaculum.
In conclusion, MR imaging of the elbow and wrist has been proven
to accurately depict injuries to tendinous, ligamentous, and
osseous structures, as well as to cartilage. MR imaging also is
ideal for excluding other differential diagnoses of acute or
chronic elbow and wrist pain. In many institutions, it has replaced
triple phase arthrography in the initial work-up of wrist pain, as
arthrograms may be negative in the presence of surgically-proven
tears of the articular disc.22 AR
References
1. Stoller DW: MR Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine,
ed 2, pp 745-775. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1997.
2. Gaary EA, Potter HG, Altchek DW: Medial elbow pain in the
throwing athlete: MR imaging evaluation. AJR 168:795-800, 1997.
3. Morrey BF, An AKN: Articular and ligamentous contribution to
the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med 11:315-319,
1983.
4. Cotten A, Jacobson J, Brossman J, et al: Collateral ligaments
of the elbow: Conventional MR imaging and MR arthrography with
coronal oblique plane and elbow flexion. Radiology 204(3):806-812,
1997.
5. Potter HG, Hannafin JA, Morwessel RM, et al: Lateral
epicondylitis: Correlation of MR imaging, surgical and
histopathologic findings. Radiology 196(1):43-46, 1995.
6. Nirschl RP, Pettrome FA: Tennis elbow: The surgical treatment
of lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg (AM) 61:832-839,
1979.
7. Mirowitz SA, London SL: Ulnar collateral ligament injury in
baseball pitchers: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 185:573-576,
1992.
8. Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Cheung YY: Pseudodefect of the
capitellum: A potential MR imaging pitfall. Radiology 191:821-823,
1994.
9. O'Driscoll SW, Morrey BF: Lateral collateral ligament injury.
In: Morrey BF (ed): The Elbow and its Disorders, pp 573-580.
Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1993.
10. Potter HG, Weiland AJ, Schatz JA, et al: Posterolateral
rotatory instability of the elbow: Usefulness of MR imaging in
diagnosis. Radiology 204:185-189, 1997.
11. Totterman SMS, Miller RJ: Triangular fibrocartilage complex:
Normal appearance on coronal three-dimensional
gradient-recalled-echo MR images. Radiology 195:521-527, 1995.
12. Oneson SR, Scales LM, Timins ME, et al: MR imaging
interpretation of the palmer classification of triangular
fibrocartilage complex lesions. Radiographics 16:97-106, 1996.
13. Palmer AK: Triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions: A
classification. J Hand Surg (AM) 14:594-605, 1989.
14. Oneson SR, Timins ME, Scales LM, et al: MR imaging diagnosis
of triangular fibrocartilage pathology with correlation. AJR
168:1513-1518, 1997.
15. Totterman SMS, Miller RS, McCance SE, Myers SP: Lesions of
the triangular fibrocartilage complex: MR findings with a
three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo sequence. Radiology
199:227-232, 1996.
16. Potter HG, Asnis-Ernberg L, Weiland AJ, et al: The utility
of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of
the triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist. J Bone Joint
Surg 79(A):1675-1684, 1997.
17. Bednar MS, Arnoczky SP Weiland AS: The microvasculature of
the triangular fibrocartilage complex: Its clinical significance. J
Hand Surg (AM) 10:1101-1105, 1991.
18. Totterman SMS, Miller RJ: Scapholunate ligament: Normal MR
appearance on three-dimensional gradient-recalled-echo images.
Radiology 200:237-241, 1996.
19. Mayfield JK: Pathogenesis of wrist ligament instability. In:
Lichtman DM (ed): The wrist and its disorders, pp 53-73.
Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1988.
20. Smith DK, Snearly WN: Lunotriquetral interosseous ligament
of the wrist: MR appearances in asymptomatic volunteers and
arthrographically normal wrists. Radiology 191:199-202, 1994.
21. Radack DM, Schweitzer ME, Taras J: Carpal tunnel syndrome:
Are the MR findings a result of population selection bias? AJR
169:1649-1653, 1997.
22. Chung KC, Zimmerman NB, Travis NT: Wrist arthrography versus
arthroscopy: A comparative study of 150 cases. J Hand Surg
21A:591-594, 1996.
Dr. Decker is a fellow in Musculoskeletal Radiology at the
Hospital of Special Surgery in New York, NY, where Dr. Potter is
Chief of the MRI Division.
Dr. Potter is also Associate Professor of Radiology at Cornell
University Medical College in New York, NY.