Visualization of specific molecular events with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds great promise for both clinical and basic science applications. The exquisite tissue contrast of traditional MRI coupled with the enhancement provided by novel probes is a particularly appealing combination to highlight molecular events in normal and disease states. This review focuses on the factors necessary for successful molecular MRI probe development and will highlight some of the applications that are promising for use in clinical practice.
Dr. MacKenzie
is currently a fourth-year Radiology Resident at Brigham and
Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. He earned his BS double major in
Computer Science and Biological Science and his MS in Biological
Science from Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, and his MD from
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY. Dr. MacKenzie
is an American Board of Radiology B. Leonard Holman Research
Pathway Resident with a focus on Molecular Imaging applications
for arthritis. Dr. MacKenzie will start a Fellowship in
Musculoskeletal Radiology at the University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA, in July 2005.
Molecular imaging may be defined as the imaging of specific
biological processes at the molecular and cellular level in living
organ-isms.
1,2
The goal is to reveal the early underlying biochemical and genetic
events responsible for disease rather than indirect and late
changes (eg, altered blood flow or tumor size) as seen with most
current clinical diagnostic imaging modalities. Direct imaging of
events fundamental to disease processes with molecular imaging
should ultimately translate into better patient care through
earlier and more specific detection and intervention.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is uniquely suited to play a
large role in molecular imaging. When compared with other imaging
modalities, the excellent anatomical resolution
3
and multiplanar capabilities make MRI particularly worthy to
pinpoint molecular events (Table 1).
4
With molecular MRI, there is no radiation exposure or need for
coregistration of molecular activity with anatomic structures as
there is with positron emission tomography coupled with computed
tomography (PET/CT). The expense and the relatively large and
possibly toxic concentrations of contrast probe required to detect
molecular events are some of the challenges facing molecular MRI.
5
In recent years, there has been intense interest in molecular
imaging with MR techniques. This growing research discipline has
emerged, in a large part, due to rapid advances in our
understanding of specific molecular pathways from contributions in
fields such as biochemistry, molecular biology, cellular biology,
and genetics. Numerous examples illustrate the recent advances that
have been critical in transitioning the concept of molecular MRI
into a working reality. The human genome provides a map of the
fundamental building blocks for the biomarkers that may be detected
with molecular imaging; molecular cloning allows for the rapid
production of novel DNA and proteins that may be suitable imaging
targets or probes; X-ray crystallography creates a 3-dimensional
(3D) structure of biomolecules that may serve as imaging probes or
targets. Chip arrays, bioinformatics, gene therapy, and proteomics
are other important advances in the mainstream or near horizon of
basic science investigation. The list of tools available to aid in
the development of molecular imaging techniques continues to
grow.
Advances in our understanding of the molecular and genetic basis
for disease have led to the need for noninvasive imaging techniques
that can reveal molecular events in vivo. In general, there are 3
criteria that must be met for successful molecular MRI
applications: 1) sufficient production of MR contrast to depict the
molecular event; 2) favorable pharmacokinetics for the molecular
probe; and 3) proven usefulness of the probe- that is, validated
for basic science or clinical applications.
Production of contrast on MRI
Three different classes of contrast agents may be tailored for
molecular applications to produce visible signal changes on MR
images: paramagnetic contrast agents, superparamagnetic particles,
and metabolite detection with MR spectroscopy. Each class has
unique properties that must be considered for the contrast agent to
be useful for molecular applications.
The majority of MR images are based upon the nuclear MR signal
from water protons. The signal intensity produced in any given
voxel (3D volume) is a function of the imaging sequence (eg,
gradient echo, spin echo, fast spin echo, etc.) and the selected
sequence parameters, such as the repetition time (TR), and echo
time (TE), as well as of the intrinsic tissue properties. These are
primarily the water proton spin density, and water relaxation times
T1, T2, and T2*. Local variations in these intrinsic tissue
parameters provide the image contrast offered by MR. The
paramagnetic and superparamagnetic contrast agents primarily affect
the local microenvironment to produce image contrast by altering
the tissue relaxations times, in particular T2*, which dramatically
decreases the signal intensity in typical gradient-echo
acquisitions.
4-7
A third, and substantially different, means of imaging molecular
events is with MR spectroscopy. In MR spectroscopy, instead of
using image contrast, a metabolite that is produced by or heralds
the molecular event is detected by the metabolite's spectroscopic
peak at a precise anatomic location. Although MR spectroscopy may
not be considered molecular imaging when the molecular event is
rigidly defined as a ligand-receptor interaction,
8
systems have been designed with MR spectroscopy to detect precisely
controlled genetic events such as genetically engineered conversion
of a prodrug into its active chemotherapeutic agent.
9
Molecular probe design and development
Most current molecular probes for MRI combine either a
paramagnetic or superparamagnetic contrast agent with a
high-affinity ligand that is specific for a particular molecular
target or receptor. The ligand on the molecular probe is specific
for a molecular target, an imaging biomarker, used to help
establish the presence or severity of disease.
10
Targets may be any molecular process and range from 2 copies of DNA
per cell to hundreds of thousands of intra- or extracellular
proteins or metabolites (Figure 1).
1
High-affinity imaging probes are fundamentally different from
nonspecific contrast agents, such as the widely used intravenous
gadolinium diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA).
Molecular contrast agents are generally distributed throughout the
body based on a dynamic interplay between the physiochemical
properties of the probe and the physiology of the body. While
physiologic parameters primarily regulate the distribution of
Gd-DTPA (eg, blood flow, ability to diffuse into the extracellular
space), the ligand on the molecular probe helps the contrast agent
to accumulate at the site of interest.
7
An understanding of the pharmaco-kinetics of the molecular probe
is essential for successful implementation. The ability of a probe
to detect the target molecule is governed by classic pharmacology:
the route of administration/absorption, distribution/delivery to
the target, and elimination through metabolism or excretion. An
ideal molecular probe is one with favorable pharmacokinetics such
that the probe can be administered easily, distributes efficiently
to the biomarker, and is cleared from the patient with minimal side
effects.
5-7
Clearly, the ligand-receptor interaction is a dynamic
interaction and will affect the MRI parameters. The timing of
imaging after the probe administration is paramount. For example,
many contrast agents require a 24-hour delay after administration
before sufficient quantities of the probe have accumulated at the
target, necessitating careful registration of pre- and postcontrast
images. Resolution and speed of image acquisition required to
detect signal changes from the molecular probe are also equally
important considerations. Many examples illustrate the various
factors that must be considered when developing the imaging
parameters and can be found in applications of oncologic and
arthritis imaging, thrombosis detection, and genetic and cell-based
therapies.
Clinical applications
Tumor imaging
Many aspects of tumor biology are governed by molecular events,
and it is likely that molecular MRI will enhance tumor detection,
provide accurate pretreatment staging, monitor response to therapy,
and survey for reoccurrence after remission. The molecular MRI
application that has been best described and has the potential for
widespread clinical practice is the use of lymphotropic
superparamagnetic nanoparticles
11
in the nodal staging of prostate cancer (Figure 2). Harisinghani
and others
12
found that the majority (71%) of malignant nodes detected with the
superparamagnetic nanoparticles were smaller than the threshold
size (10 mm) used to identify nodal disease on conventional CT and
MRI. MRI with super-paramagnetic nanoparticles had a high overall
sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy on both a per-patient and a
node-by-node basis, and the negative predictive value of the test
was very high (100%). The implications of detecting metastasis are
considerable, because patients with positive lymph nodes receive
androgen-deprivation therapy with radiation and are spared a
radical prostatectomy.
13-17
A goal of molecular MRI contrast agents is to improve the
detection of malignant cells both at the primary site of
development and at locations of metastasis. For example, the
formation of de novo blood vessels is a common characteristic of
many tumors. MRI probes specific to molecules responsible for
angiogenesis have been used to assess tumor growth and malignant
potential.
18
Another means of improving the early detection of malignancy
could be with gadolinium (Gd)-encapsulated liposomes that
preferentially target tumor cells. Similar to
2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)
that measures increased glucose metabolism to mark areas of tumor,
an MRI contrast agent was developed that presents ligands bearing
glucose conjugates at the liposome surface.
19
Active targeting of tumor cells with liposomes is attractive not
only because high concentrations of MRI contrast material can be
delivered in the liposome, but also because liposomes can
encapsulate drugs.
20-22
Thus, a liposome approach could simultaneously show tumor burden
and deliver chemo-therapeutic agents. Although potential pitfalls
include immunogenicity and a relatively large size that may prevent
liposome access into the extracellular compartment,
23
methods have been devised to decrease immunogenicity
24,25
or increase delivery of bulky molecular probes into the
extracellular compartment or across the blood-brain barrier.
26-29
A novel MRI contrast agent has also been developed to monitor
tumor progression and response to treatment. Zhao and coworkers
30
developed a superparamagnetic probe specific to cells expressing
synaptotagmin I, a molecule that binds to cell membranes of
apoptotic cells. The degree of programmed cell death after
chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been shown to correlate with
tumor growth delay and cure
31,32
and the superparamagnetic probe conjugated to synaptotagmin I
showed good correlation with apoptosis both in vitro and in
vivo.
Arthritis imaging
The spectrum of diseases that comprises inflammatory arthritis
is largely mediated by immune mechanisms, some of which are well
characterized on the molecular level and are ripe for molecular MRI
probe development. Activated macrophages in areas in which
inflammation can be labeled with superparamagnetic agents,
presumably through macrophage phagocytosis, can be detected with
MRI.
33
For example, the use of superparamagnetic particles in a rat model
of antigen-induced arthritis showed potential in detecting the
degree of macrophage infiltration.
34
The superparamagnetic particles indicated areas of early
inflammation and correlated with treatment response, suggesting
that molecular MRI might provide advanced detection for early
intervention before the development of irreversible bone
erosions.
Detection of thrombosis
Molecular imaging approaches for the detection of arterial or
venous thrombosis would benefit patients by providing a specific,
noninvasive test. Current MRI methods of clot detection have
limitations. Blood on traditional MRI sequences shows variable
signal characteristics depending on the age of the clot, which
makes interpretation of MR images for thrombosis challenging.
35-38
Furthermore, many clinically significant thrombotic events occur in
small, distal coronary or pulmonary arteries that are prone to
motion artifact and are below the resolution of current fast MR
sequences.
39
In these scenarios, a molecular probe would provide a specific
marker to improve the detection of small thrombi.
One approach by Botnar and colleagues
40
shows the potential for a Gd-based probe to detect acute and
subacute thrombosis. Four atoms of Gd-DTPA were attached to a
peptide specific for fibrin, and this molecular probe showed high
contrast among thrombus, thrombus-free vessel wall, and blood
(Figure 3). This probe combines high molecular specificity for
thrombus formation by binding the product of an activated
coagulation system, with an MRI contrast agent with excellent
signal due to the increased T1 relaxivity conferred by multiple
atoms of Gd per probe mole-cule.
5
Long-circulating ultrasmall superparamagnetic contrast agents have
also been used to image macrophage and monocyte activity in
atherosclerotic plaques.
41,42
Gene therapy
As clinical applications for gene therapy are developed,
molecular MRI is expected to play a role in multiple areas. MRI may
monitor the progression and quantify the amount of gene delivered
to the site of interest as well as report on the efficiency and
duration of transgene expression. One example is EGadMe, a "smart"
molecular imaging probe that irreversibly transitions from a weak
to a strong relaxivity state in the presence of a common reporter
gene product, β-galactosidase (β-gal).
43
Cells that express the therapeutic gene generally also express the
reporter gene β-gal and produce MRI contrast enhancement as a
result of β-gal cleavage of EGadMe to the strong relaxivity state
(Figure 4).
EGadMe is important because before inducing the therapeutic
transgene, the efficacy of most viral vectors is first tested with
a reporter gene such as β-gal. In addition, noninvasive imaging
with a probe specific for transgene activity may evaluate which
tissues are preferentially transduced and quantify gene expression
over time without having to sacrifice test organisms.
Molecular MRI may also quantify and localize gene activity by
detecting the metabolites that are produced by a transgene. For
instance, the transgene for tyrosinase has been incorporated into
cells and its activity measured by its production of melanin.
Tyrosinase catalyzes the production of melanins, which have a
remarkably high metal-binding capacity (up to 35% by weight).
During tyrosinase expression, investigators have shown a resulting
bright signal of iron containing melanin on T1-weighted images.
44,45
MR spectroscopy has also been used to measure cytosine deaminase
transgene expression in vivo by quantifying the transgene's
enzymatic production of 5-fluorouracil (Figure 5).
9
Cell-based therapies
Similar to gene therapy, cell-based therapies are becoming
increasingly more common options, and molecular MRI may speed
development and augment treatment monitoring. Bone marrow
transplant is in wide clinical practice and may benefit from in
vivo tracking of transplanted hematopoietic cells
46
as therapies are improved and new treatment regimens are tested.
Currently, the amount of MR contrast agent delivered to cells can
be increased with transfection techniques,
47
and single cells may be imaged.
48
As more cell-based therapies are envisioned and tested (eg,
transplanting cardiac myocytes to rescue cardiac function
49
), the increasing momentum for in vivo and noninvasive monitoring
will further develop the field of molecular MRI.
Validation
The success or failure of molecular MRI lies in the validation
of the particular MR-based probe as a clinically useful tool. A
molecular probe generally detects a surrogate end point, a marker
of the natural history and factors associated with disease
progression rather than clinical outcome measurements such as
morbidity and mortality (Table 2).
10,50
There should be a strong link of the biomarker with the true end
point sought-usually decreased morbidity and/or mortality.
51
Generally, validation through extensive patient experience is
required for a surrogate to be accepted for clinical use to
minimize the uncertainty of unexpected and inaccurate information
that may result from limited experience with a relatively untested
biomarker.
10
The biomarker should reflect the effect of therapy, and the
detection of the biomarker must be accurate, reproducible, and
feasible over time.
10
Furthermore, the side effect profile or toxicity should be balanced
with the benefit gained from the information provided by the
molecular imaging study. It follows that the molecular MRI probes
most likely to be successful will be those that target surrogate
end points that have been well studied and characterized in large
groups of patients.
Conclusion
The enormous potential for molecular MRI is the reality that the
fundamental basis for most medical disease is the alteration of
molecular parameters that may be readily visualized with
sophisticated imaging techniques. Unlike most current clinical
diagnostic imaging modalities, the aim of molecular MRI is to
reveal the biochemical and genetic basis of disease in addition to
demonstrating altered anatomy and physiology. The success of
molecular MRI will rely on the synergy of sophisticated MRI
techniques and the development of novel contrast agents that not
only take advantage of our expanding knowledge of molecular
process/disease, but also show well-validated clinical or basic
science applications.
Acknowledgment
The author wishes to thank Drs. Frank Rybicki and Philipp Lang
for their thorough review and insightful comments regarding the
contents of the manuscript and Drs. Philipp Lang, Frank Rybicki,
David Lee, and Prof. Ashfaq Mahmood for their mentorship and
support (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School).
Many thanks are due to Prof. René M. Botnar (Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, Harvard Medical School), who kindly contributed a
sample of her work for reproduction here.