Summary: Last time we spoke to our intrepid radiologist, he was wading through
the stack of outside CD copies in the inbox at the outpatient imaging
center…
Dr. Phillips is a Professor of Radiology, Director of Head
and Neck Imaging, at Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New
York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. He is a member of the Applied Radiology Editorial Advisory Board.
Last time we spoke to our intrepid radiologist, he was wading through
the stack of outside CD copies in the inbox at the outpatient imaging
center…
I have prayed to the radiology gods for someone, anyone,
to standardize the systems we use to read outside images. Several brave
souls have listened to the entirety of my crazed, arm-flapping,
high-speed screed, and have suggested various and sundry solutions. “Buy
a Mac.” “Refuse to read them until they are into your system,” or
“Refuse them all,” or “Bill for them. Honestly, we do, and we make
zillions of dollars!”
I believe nothing I hear, less of what I
read, and nothing I see in this regard. This isn’t going away anytime
soon. It just festers.
No vendor worth their salt is going to
confess that their own viewer is a piece of trash. In fact, they
probably are all about the same tool, but they can’t seem to agree on
even the simple things, like icons, where tools should be, how to window
and level, how to organize the images, or ANYTHING. It is like they
purposely, with malice and forethought, tried to do everything
diametrically different from their competition. “Okay, they put the
tools on the right and top. We’ll put them on the bottom and left.”
“Their brightness icon is a sun. We’ll make ours a lightbulb.” I think
there is a special bad place for people like this to go, when their last
days of trudging on the earth have passed.
I’m relatively
certain that many learned people have met in rooms to discuss this
topic. They likely created taskforces, and subcommittees, and maybe even
the infamous SPECIAL taskforces, all to deal with this issue. And, they
have likely created reams of paper. And, it hasn’t changed a freaking
thing.
I’m not giving up. I think that it might require fairly
draconian solutions, but there is potential to make this easier for us
all. Here’s a start. If your group uses a different viewer than other
groups around, try your own out for ease of use. If it sucks, tell your
IT folks. Tell them: “Swap this piece of crap out. Get us the same one
the other folks have.” Maybe, just maybe, all us radiologists could get
together and decide we like one viewer the best, and tell the vendors
to play nice and make them all be the same. Stop wasting more of our
time, and let us get back to reading new cases.
Naah. Never happen. More effective time-wasting items to follow. Mahalo.
Read the first part of this Wet Read series, How best to waste my time, in the September 2012 issue of Applied Radiology