Dr. Phillips
is a Professor in the Departments of Radiology, Neurosurgery, and
Otolaryngology; the Head and Neck Surgery Director, Division of
Neuroradiology; and Vice Chair of Finance in the Department of
Radiology, University of Virginia Health Systems,
Charlottesville, VA. He is also a member of the editorial board
of this journal.
Given the floor for a moment, and with a broad-based largely
radiology audience, I would like to place my two cents upon the
table regarding the new generation of "turf battles" being waged by
radiology and other specialties. Many specialties have now
developed "requirements" for their trainees in traditional
radiology roles. A "request for opportunities" in radiology
procedures morphs into a training "requirement" over time. We, as
radiologists, find ourselves being requested to train other
specialties in our procedures. Our payback? These services will
continue to send us patients, at least until their own trainees are
practicing in sufficient numbers to dominate. The interventional
radiologists find themselves particularly hard-pressed for
endovascular treatments. Although radiology has done much over time
to benefit other specialties, the hospitals, and, more importantly,
the patients, we have few friends as these battles wage.
Who suffers? At the outset, plainly, our trainees suffer. They
see fewer cases, become more and more disenchanted with these
subspecialty radiology opportunities as they see more incursions
from other specialties, and the whole chain becomes
self-fulfilling. We, as radiologists, also feel that patients
suffer. The radiology community has worked hard to develop and
perfect many of these techniques, often on patients who had no
viable treatment alternative, and often, initially, for little
reimbursement. We practice and preach radiation protection, and
have been available at any time, day or night, to perform them.
Lastly, we, ourselves, obviously suffer. We set standards for
expertise and require additional training for our fellows, yet find
physicians with 3-month "certification" applying for, and
receiving, credentials. We continue to lose procedures and
reimbursement.
Although I do not tend to doom and gloom, I have not been able
to hear many positive notes on these issues. The professional
organizations have little clout, apparently. We could try a similar
course as the other specialties. Imagine a directive from the
radiology community requiring programs to offer "opportunities" in
cardiac catheterization and stent placement, or in performing minor
vascular/urologic/biliary surgery to be approved by the Residency
Review Committee! But this doesn't seem to be a fruitful course. It
seems that our typical response, "radiologists can perform this
procedure most skillfully based on their training" holds little
sway these days.
I have read and reread a book entitled
A Bomb in the Brain
(Charles Scribner's Sons, New York), by Steve Fishman, a widely
published journalist from New York City. It deals on a very
personal level with his intracranial hemorrhage from an
arteriovenous malfunction, his subsequent medical evaluation and
surgery, and his personal and researched views on a number of
medical topics. A section pertaining to the development of
neuroradiology as a specialty is particularly pertinent. Early on,
neurosurgeons performed neuroangiography, but Dr. Joseph Ransohoff,
then chief of neurosurgery at New York University believed that the
budding subspecialists from neuroradiology should perform them.
Government investigators were actually sent to see why he said so.
"Because they do them better," was Ransohoff's response (p.
56).
Perhaps there is no right answer, but much more careful
attention to these issues must be paid by the American College of
Radiology, the Association of University Radiologists, the
Radiological Society of North America, the American Roentgen Ray
Society, the American Board of Radiology, the Accreditation Council
for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Medical
Specialties. We don't want to throw the radiology baby out with the
turf bathwater.