Dr. J. Kevin McGraw is the Co-Director of the Center for
Vascular and Interventional Radiology, St. Vincent Mercy
Medical Center, Toledo, OH, and Riverside Methodist Hospital,
Columbus, OH. Dr. Jeffrey S. Silber is an Interventional
Radiologist at the Center for Vascular and Interventional
Radiology, St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, OH, and
Doylestown Hospital, Doylestown, PA.
Chronic lumbar pain is a common cause of disability, with an
estimated 5% of the American population suffering from chronic,
disabling low back pain. Acute low back pain often responds to
physical therapy and activity modification. Approximately 90% of
acute low back pain sufferers will have a resolution of their pain
within 6 to12 weeks, but epidemiologic studies have shown that more
than 60% of patients will suffer from recurrent symptoms. It has
been reported that the prevalence of discogenic pain among patients
with chronic low back pain approaches 40%.
1
Treatment options for discogenic pain include conservative measures
such as physical therapy and steroid injection; and more aggressive
strategies include surgery with discectomy and spinal fusion. In
recent years, a new, minimally invasive, fluoroscopically guided
treatment option has been developed called intradiscal
electrothermal therapy (IDET).
Pathophysiology
A combination of complex interactions underlies the basis for
chronic discogenic pain. The disc is an innervated structure that
is capable of pain generation. Pain fibers or nociceptors are
present in the outer posterolateral portion of the lumbar disc.
Nociceptor afferent transmission is relayed through the dorsal root
ganglion (DRG). Ingrowth of granulation tissue and small
unmyelinated nerve fibers has been shown to occur in the
degenerated disc.
The natural history of the degenerating disc includes loss of
nuclear hydrostatic pressure, which leads to buckling of the
annular lamellae. This phenomenon leads to increased mobility and
shear stress to the annular wall. The process may continue,
resulting in either radial or concentric fissuring of the annulus.
The progressive degeneration of the disc, manifested by any of the
above morphologic changes, has been shown to alter disc mechanics.
Mechanoreceptors in the disc wall can discharge in the presence of
increased disc mobilization.
1
Chronic discogenic back pain can develop with any combination of
annular fissures, delamination, or microfractures of collagen
fibrils, leading to mechanical distortion of the annular lamellae
and subsequent sensitization of nociceptors. This disrupted disc
can cause referred pain into the buttocks and legs due to dorsal
root ganglion stimulation or from direct chemical irritation of the
nerve roots. The combination of mechanical and neural properties
creates an interplay that leads to chronic discogenic pain.
There are three general types of disc pathologies: the "leg
pain" disc, caused by the classic disc herniation with nuclear
migration and sciatica accompanied by true dural tension; the "back
pain" disc, caused by the internally disrupted disc (discogenic
pain) with annular pathology, resulting in back pain, variable
amounts of leg and buttock pain without frank radiculopathy, and a
mixed pattern, such as with small contained disc herniations and
central herniations. In addition, the postoperative disc can be a
source of pain that mimics internal disc derangement.
To treat discogenic pain successfully, the mechanical and neural
factors must be addressed. The IDET procedure was developed to
thermocoagulate annular tissue and to thermally modulate collagen.
Granulation tissue, which may be both vascularized and innervated,
can likewise be cauterized. Small, contained disc herniations may
also be addressed by reduction in nuclear volume.
IDET: Mechanism of action
Heat energy has been used medically for many years. Tissue
cutting, tumor ablation, thermal coagulation, and physical therapy
are some of the areas in which heat has been applied in medical
care. Recently, the use of heat therapy has expanded to control
contraction or shrinkage of collagenous tissue. The intervertebral
disc is a relatively avascular structure, which allows heat to be
held in the tissues with little fluctuation in temperature during
treatment. Adjacent structures, such as the spinal cord and nerve
roots, are protected from thermal injury by the vascular
circulation outside the disc and by cerebrospinal fluid, which
quickly dissipates any heat conducted beyond the tissue.
Effect on neural tissue
As previously mentioned, the disc is an innervated structure.
Bogduk
2
illustrated the sources of lumbar disc innervation and Coppes et al
3
found nociceptive properties in nerves of the outer annular wall.
Fremont et al
4
also discovered nerve fibers as deep as the inner third of the
annulus fibrosis and into the nucleus pulposus in several disc
samples.
Thermal destruction of nerve tissue is well documented and
widely used in the brain and elsewhere in the body. Brodkey et al
5
established that irreversible nerve blocks occur at 45šC in the
brain, and Cosman and Cosman
6
used radiofrequency energy to produce 45šC isotherms for neural
tissue destruction. With the IDET procedure, the catheter used is
actually a thermal resistive coil. Heat produced by the catheter is
conducted to the annular wall. Temperatures produced by the IDET
catheter in the outer third of the annulus (approximately 46š to
48šC) are felt to be sufficient for the destruction of pain
fibers.
Effect on collagen
The intervertebral disc is composed primarily of type 1 and type
2 collagen, both of which have similar molecular structures. The
strength of the collagen fibers is due to the triple-helix
molecule, which is cross-linked with hydrogen bonds. Collagen will
shrink when heated, secondary to the disruption of the
heat-sensitive hydrogen bonds. The optimal temperature for collagen
contraction is reported to be 65šC. Hydrogen bonds start to break
at 60šC. It is unclear whether there is a significant shrinkage
effect over 75šC. Thermal contraction of collagen depends not only
on degree of heating but also on duration of heating. Lower
temperatures over a longer period of time result in shrinkage
comparable with that achieved with a higher temperature over a
shorter period of time. Under these parameters, IDET can shrink the
fibers of the disc annulus and nucleus, relieving pressure of a
disrupted disc by decreasing the volume of the nucleus pulposus.
Contraction, and therefore tightening, of the annular fibers may
also enhance the structural integrity of the degenerated or damaged
disc and could stabilize fissures.
7
Patient selection
The IDET procedure is best suited for patients with mild to
moderate degenerative disc disease, absent radicular symptoms, and
a positive discogram. The process of patient selection involves
identification and exclusion of patients who would be unlikely to
benefit from the IDET procedure. Contraindications include large
disc herniations, nerve root irritation secondary to mass effect,
central stenosis, instability, and disc height loss beyond 50%.
This information is obtained during a clinic visit, at which time
imaging studies, including MRI if available, are reviewed with the
patient. Findings on MRI usually include disc desiccation and,
possibly, the presence of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) that has been
shown to correlate with an annular tear in 89% of cases (figure 1).
If there are no contraindications, a discogram is performed. If
concordant pain (reproducing the patient's typical symptoms) is
reproduced at discography, the patient is an IDET candidate. We
further counsel the patient and perform the IDET at least 1 week
following the discogram. IDET cannot be performed at the time of
discography since the liquid contrast would cool the IDET catheter
and prevent even distribution of the thermal energy into the
posterior annular wall. If the discogram is not clearly concordant,
we do not offer IDET. Generally, about one-third of patients
referred to our clinic eventually undergo IDET.
Many factors have been suggested to correlate with high clinical
success rates following IDET. These factors include a young age,
the presence of an annular tear, a nonsmoker, and a truly motivated
patient. For example, an ideal patient would be a young, motivated
nonsmoker with a single-level annular tear and a concordant
discogram. This type of patient, unfortunately, does not make up
the majority of our clinic referrals. Many patients are
"borderline" IDET candidates, but most are clear regarding
candidacy. In difficult cases, the use of electromyelography to
clarify the source of the pain may be helpful, although it is
rarely necessary.
Procedure
After obtaining informed consent, the patient is placed in the
prone position. Intravenous conscious sedation is finely titrated,
since patient feedback during the procedure is critical. The skin
is prepped and draped for potential bilateral posterolateral
approaches. A 17-gauge needle is directed into the center of the
disc under fluoroscopic control in a path adjacent to the articular
facets in order to avoid nerve roots (figure 2). The stylet is then
removed and the Spinecath--a steerable, flexible probe with a
distal thermal resistive coil portion--is advanced using frontal
and lateral fluoroscopy. The catheter will pass through the nucleus
and curl along the interface of the nucleus and annulus with little
resistance (figure 3). If resistance is met or the path is
unexpected, the catheter is partly withdrawn and redirected by
turning the hub. Ideal placement is along the entire posterior
annulus from the 3 o'clock to the
9 o'clock position. In approximately one-third of the cases, only
half of the posterior annulus can be covered by this approach with
the catheter being caught in annular fissures. This can sometimes
be avoided by reviewing the computed tomography (CT) of the disc
and choosing the more favorable side for approach. If this cannot
be avoided, the procedure is completed by the contralateral
approach. Before heating, one must confirm that the catheter is
contained within the disc space and that the heat delivery portion
of the catheter (indicated by two radiopaque markers) is beyond the
needle tip (figure 4). The heating protocol, which includes slowly
increasing the temperature of the catheter from 65šC to 90šC, is
then begun. The protocol includes 16 minutes of heating and
requires frequent patient feedback. Patients usually feel nothing
until the temperature reaches 75šC, at which time reproduction of
their usual symptoms is common, similar to discography. If
radicular symptoms are present with pain extending below the knee,
the unit is immediately turned off and the catheter is
repositioned. Once the protocol is completed, antibiotics are
administered intradiscally via the 17-gauge needle (5 mg cefazolin
in 1 cc) and the needle is removed. The patient is transferred to
the recovery area, maintained in the supine position for 1 hour,
and slowly mobilized before discharge. During this recovery time,
the nursing staff reviews basic postprocedural precautions,
including avoidance of heavy lifting for at least 2 weeks.
Additionally, use of anti-inflammatory medications is avoided over
the next 6 weeks. The patient is seen at 2, 6, and 12 weeks for
follow-up.
Results
Since 1998, 11 studies have reported clinical outcomes of IDET.
Many of these studies have been published in the anesthesia
literature, although some are in the physiatry and orthopedic
literature. Only one study has been published in the radiology
literature. Our data reflects 30 patients and 41 disc spaces with
follow-up ranging from 2 and 10 months. A total of 21 (72%) of 30
patients reported significant improvement in their back pain with a
visual analog scale (VAS) score decreasing by 4 or more points.
Nine (28%) of 30 patients had either no improvement or a decrease
of between 1 and 3 points on the VAS scale.
8
The most publicized of these studies is by Saal et al, a group
of physiatrists from Stanford. These investigators reported a
series of 1116 consecutive patients presenting with chronic low
back pain of >3 months in duration. Of this group, 1025 patients
were improved with aggressive nonoperative care (physical therapy,
medication, etc.) and were discharged to self-care. The 91 patients
who did not respond to nonoperative care were offered surgical
fusion. Of these 91 patients, 62 underwent IDET as an alternative
therapy and 29 remained in a control group to assess the impact of
natural history on symptom resolution. These groups were not
assigned randomly. Data was collected at 6, 12, and 24 months on 58
of the 62 IDET-treated patients. At 6-month follow-up, there was a
significant improvement in patients' pain with a decrease on the
VAS score of 3.71 ± 1.95. At 12 and 24 months, the mean decrease in
VAS score was 3.52 ± 2.30 and 3.41 ± 1.96, respectively. Based on
these data, the authors concluded that a statistically significant
improvement in pain was obtained in patients with chronic
discogenic low back pain treated thermally with the Spinecath.
9
Combining all data available in the literature, comprising a
total of 448 patients, the mean decrease in pain following IDET is
2.7 points on the VAS scale. Some clinical studies have also
assessed functional activity following IDET. The physical function
scale (PF) of SF-36 ranges from 0 to 100. Low scores indicate that
the patient is limited due to health conditions in performing
physical activities, including bathing and dressing. High scores
indicate that the patient can perform all types of physical
activities without limitations. The bodily pain scale (BP) of SF-36
ranges from 0 to 100. Low scores indicate that the patient has very
severe and limiting pain, whereas high scores indicate that there
are no limitations due to pain. The efficacy of IDET was assessed
by examining changes in these scores between pre-treatment and
follow-up, with positive changes indicating improvements in quality
of life. Five of the above-mentioned 11 studies cited the PF and BP
scores. A total of 404 patients were involved in these five
studies. An overall mean improvement in pain of 24.1 (BP) is noted.
It is generally considered that an improvement of 7 or higher is
clinically significant. The same 404 patients exhibited a 25.2
increase in their PF scores. This suggests that there is an overall
improvement in level of pain and physical function.
10-13
Although our study did not involve the BP scale or the PF scale,
these results are consistent with what we have noted in our
practice.
Complications
In our study of 30 patients and 41 levels, there was 1 minor
complication of lower extremity radicular type pain that improved
after 6 weeks. This was treated with conservative therapy that
included a tapered dose of steroids.
8
Surprisingly, not all of the above-mentioned studies addressed
complications. This may be secondary to the notion that some lower
extremity discomfort is "accepted" for a short period following
treatment. Saal et al, in their study of 62 patients followed to 24
months, reported no adverse events or complications.
9
Wetzel and Anderson
14
reported a "low complication rate" in his series of 75 patients,
but did not report an actual percentage. The remainder of the 11
studies report no additional complications. This discrepancy may be
secondary to the perception that transient lower extremity pain is
an accepted side effect and not a complication.
There has been one report of a major complication of cauda
equina syndrome. The details of this case include poor catheter
position beyond the expected posterior location of the annulus,
operator inexperience, and persistent thermal energy applied
despite the fact that the patient complained of severe lower
extremity and pelvic pain. It is felt that this potential
complication could be avoided easily with good radiographic
technique and incorporating patient feedback under light conscious
sedation.
15
Approximately 25,000 IDET procedures have been performed in the
United States, and there have been no reports of discitis. However,
this is a potential complication given the similarity of this
procedure to lumbar discography. One potential explanation is the
coaxial nature of the catheter system, such that the catheter that
is applying the heat to the posterior annulus does not contact the
skin, which would be the source of infection.
Conclusion
Intradiscal electrothermal therapy for chronic discogenic back
pain is a relatively safe and effective treatment for patients with
chronic discogenic back pain. Interventional radiologists possess
the necessary technical and clinical skills to perform the
procedure safely and effectively. Radiologists who perform
discography should consider incorporating IDET into their daily
practice.
AR