For his kind generosity, I am thankful to Dr. Keats, who saw my
recent letter to the editor of Diagnostic Imaging and invited this
commentary. This riposte was to counter a gloom-and-doom piece
written by a bitter, pseudonymous radiologist in the September 1997
issue of that journal. The author lamented all his perceived
shortcomings of a career as a radiologist and praised none of the
positive attributes. I believe he (and the journal, by publishing
it not as an opinion piece but as a major article) performed a
genuine disservice to the profession, especially to young people
entering or considering the specialty. Alas, Diagnostic Imaging did
not take me up on my charitable offer to respond, but Applied
Radiology did, and for that I am most appreciative.
Radiology is still the best medical specialty, and if you don't
believe it, just query most of the practicing radiologists in the
country. Sure, they may grouse about managed care, complain of
declining reimbursement and of working longer hours at less pay,
but there is certainly no stampede out the door, no exodus toward
alternative careers. I haven't seen many of my colleagues going
back into family medicine or surgery or psychiatry. Radiology
continues to have the most intellectual stimulation, the highest
problem-solving position in medicine. It is the generalist of all
of the specialties and is in universal demand.
The mental rewards of radiology are constantly changing and
growing and I eagerly look forward to a day at the hospital because
of the never-ending challenges. Certainly, we are all in the midst
of change and anxiety. I recall my grandfather, also a radiologist,
saying 30 years ago that the birth of Medicare would be the death
knell for physicians. Instead, it brought on the golden era of
radiology and medicine.Those days are gone, of course, but life is
still full and rich!
A recent transition in our department serves as an analogy to
the short-term angst experienced by many radiologists. After being
one of the original academic medical centers to be aligned with
Apple© computers, our department is leading the med center switch
to PCs, simply due to incompatibility with the various software
needed to run a large radiology department (not to mention other
departments). Recently, I saw my beloved computer unceremoniously
yanked out and an ungainly PC plopped in its place. The result: I
can't even get e-mail to work properly with my new monstrosity. But
amidst gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair, there is a faint
light at the end of the tunnel: much faster speed and more
applications available on a PC, even if the darn thing is more
awkward and klutzy to this user. On the bright side, at least we
have computers, something I would not have dreamed of when I
started here as an attending ten years ago.
I practice in a department with a small residency program. I
have seen no decline, and have arguably experienced an actual
increase in the caliber of medical students entering radiology.
About 70 students in our medical school are graduating this year,
four or five of whom are venturing into radiology, and these future
doctors are no slouches. Our graduating radiology residents
universally obtain good jobs, sometimes after fellowship, sometimes
not.
My radiologist friends in varied practice environments, from
small community to large academic departments, have a different
story to tell, a varied slant on how to craft the best possible
practice. If you are new to the game, talk to a few of these
people, see what works for them. I still haven't figured my
philosophy out, but in the interim have adopted the "Murray Janower
rule" (ACR presidential address, 1997): incorporate five direct
patient contacts or encounters in every work day, and your practice
will be that much more satisfying. It will also make us more
recognizable and accountable as a profession to the general
public.
There are the incessant turf wars, to be sure, but as long as we
are training topflight radiology researchers and educators, we will
win most of the battles and, I predict, the war. Not right away,
and not without struggle, but eventually. I may not be living in
the real world of medicine, here in an academic medical center in a
largely rural state, where we are relatively isolated from the
competition that has transformed radiology in the urban/suburban
centers. But the winds of change are starting to blow our way,
bringing us into the battle.
Some final thoughts: don't fret over the bottom line in your
paycheck; we are making more than 98% of the population and pursue
our careers in a warm, safe, and generally clean environment. This,
by itself, is no mean feat. We never have to worry where our next
meal is coming from, unlike a sizable percentage of the global
population. So, if your glass used to be 3/4 full and is now 1/2
empty, remember that it is still half full. As radiologists, we
would do well to remember the words of Mark Twain, "I have been
through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually
happened."
Dr. Harris is Associate Professor of Radiology at Dartmouth
Medical School, Dartmouth-
Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, New Hampshire; he is also
the newest member of the editorial advisory board of this
journal.