<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <rss version="2.0"><channel><title>RSS Feed on Applied Radiology</title><link>http://www.appliedradiology.com</link><description> RSS Feed on Applied Radiology</description><item><title>Editorial: The march of technology in the radiology workplace: Are we getting trampled?</title><link>http://www.appliedradiology.com//Issues/2006/09/Editorials/Editorial--The-march-of-technology-in-the-radiology-workplace--Are-we-getting-trampled-.aspx</link><description>I am now of&amp;#64257;cially old enough to be nostalgic. As a resident, fellow, and junior faculty member, I was content to sit at the view boxes, put up my &amp;#64257;lms, dictate into a tape recorder, and place the &amp;#64257;lms back in the patient’s &amp;#64257;lm jacket; possibly the correct jacket. I answered one telephone on the wall. I had a beeper with no text. True, roughly 20% of “my” &amp;#64257;lms never made it to me to be interpreted. Previous &amp;#64257;lms were available in the &amp;#64257;lm folder about 70% of the time. The transcriptionist occasionally invented new words and “rhabdomyosarcoma” once became, “rather mild sarcoma.” Another time “the patient was prepped and raped in the usual fashion.” The &amp;#64257;nal reports typically got to the chart in 3 to 5 days...</description><author></author><pubDate>Tuesday, 05 Sep 2006 10:02:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>