<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <rss version="2.0"><channel><title>RSS Feed on Applied Radiology</title><link>http://www.appliedradiology.com</link><description> RSS Feed on Applied Radiology</description><item><title>Second opinion readings on outside studies: Should we bother?</title><link>http://www.appliedradiology.com//Issues/2012/07/Editorials/Second-opinion-readings-on-outside-studies--Should-we-bother-.aspx</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past 7 years, my thinking on how to manage “outside images” at 
our trauma center has completely changed. In 2005, when images on 
transferred patients arrived on film, or increasingly on CD, one of our 
radiology residents would look at the studies, correlate them with any 
written materials — which might consist of a handwritten note or, 
occasionally, a final report — and answer any questions the trauma 
surgery resident might have. Attending radiologists would occasionally 
be consulted for problematic cases; the attending trauma surgeon would 
also usually be involved in this consultation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author></author><pubDate>Tuesday, 10 Jul 2012 12:42:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>