Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. In the most recent survey of the National Center for Health Statistics, approximately 466,000 CABG procedures were performed in 2005 at an initial hospital cost of approximately $14 billion.1,2 According to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, CABG surgery is the standard of care in the treatment of advanced coronary artery disease. Recommended indications include significant left main coronary artery stenosis, stenosis ≥70% in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and proximal left circumflex artery, and 3-vessel coronary artery disease.3 The ultimate goal of CABG is to relieve symptoms and prolong life.

Notwithstanding the clear benefits of bypass grafting, recurrent chest pain after myocardial revascularization is a common postoperative presentation.4 The long-term clinical outcome after surgery is dependent on the patency of the bypass grafts and the progression of native coronary artery disease.5-7 Conventional coronary angiography is traditionally used to assess the status of bypass grafts, but technical advances in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) have given the radiologist the ability to evaluate bypass grafts noninvasively.

Traditionally, bypass grafts are performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass after chemically arresting the heart (on-pump grafting). In recent years, new surgical techniques permit CABG without a heart-lung machine or cardioplegia (off-pump grafting). Debate exists among cardiac surgeons as to which of the 2 surgical approaches is superior, but excellent outcomes can be achieved with either strategy.8 Benefits of on-pump CABG are that it is less technically demanding, permits more grafts to be constructed per procedure, and, possibly, has better long-term graft patency. Proponents of off-pump CABG suggest that it decreases the length of hospital stay, the amount of blood loss during surgery, and other complications such as renal insufficiency and neurocognitive dysfunction. A second area of controversy is whether to focus bypass grafting on the left circulation or to attempt additional grafting to achieve what is termed “total arterial revascularization,” which includes the posteroinferior left ventricle.

Initial investigation of bypass grafts was done with single-slice scanners and electron-beam CT.9 Subsequently, the addition of electrocardiographic (ECG) gating and the improved capabilities available with 4- or 16-slice MDCT scanners for rapid scanning of the area of interest led to promising results in the imaging of bypass grafts.10-12 The introduction of 64-slice MDCT and dual-source CT permitted improved temporal resolution (up to 83 msec) and spatial resolution (0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3) and reduction of both cardiac and respiratory motion, leading to improved assessment of graft stenosis and occlusion.13 Moreover, 3-dimensional (3D) image processing and advanced volumetric visualization techniques now allow radiologists to evaluate coronary grafts in multiple planes using various projections. Recent studies using 64-slice MDCT have reported sensitivity and specificity values of 93.3% to 100% and 91.4% to 100%, respectively, for graft occlusion and high-grade stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing).14-17

MDCT protocol

There are a variety of protocols for image acquisition in the evaluation of patients after CABG surgery. In many respects, the protocol is similar to that for coronary CT angiography (CTA). One important difference is that the scan should be extended superiorly to include the origins of the internal mammary arteries. At the University of Maryland, patients are scanned using a 64-MDCT scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Patients are placed in the gantry in the supine position. The scan duration is approximately 15 seconds. At our center, scanning is performed in a caudal-to-cranial direction to obtain images of the heart during the initial part of the acquisition when breath-holding is most effective. The acquisition parameters are 120 kV, 0.4-second rotation time, 800 mAs, pitch of 0.2, and 64 × 0.625-mm detectors (Table 1).

Table 1. 64-slice MDCT protocol for CABG

Cardiac CTA technique requires rapid injection of nonionic, iodinated, low-osmolar intravenous contrast. At our institution, 150 mL of isohexol (Omnipaque 350 mgI/mL; GE Healthcare Inc., Princeton, NJ) with saline is injected using a dual-head injector (EnVision CT Injection System; Medrad, Indianola, PA). To optimize the opacification of the left ventricle, coronary arteries, and bypass grafts, an anatomic, automatic triggering method (Bolus Pro, Philips Medical Systems) is used, with a threshold preset of 150 HU at the region of interest in the descending aorta and a 10-second delay prior to image acquisition.

Oral or intravenous beta-adrenergic blocking medications, specifically met o prolol (Lopressor; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ), are administered prior to scanning to prevent heart rate variability and tachycardia. Images are acquired with a heart rate <70 beats per second, if possible, and with breath-holding during mid-inspiration to prevent substantial inflow of unopacified blood into the right atrium, which may result in heterogeneity of contrast.

Retrospective ECG-gated CTA is essential for optimal image acquisition and reconstruction of evenly spaced phases of the cardiac cycle. The images are acquired in a limited field of view with axial images centered on the heart. Using 60% to 80% of the R-R interval, with 0.9-mm thick images reconstructed in 0.45-mm increments, axial source images, 3D volume-rendered images, and multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images are generated. Both 3D volume-rendering and MPR images are used to assess the bypass grafts, proximal and/or distal graft anastomoses, and the cardiac anatomy. In particular, curved planar images with centerlines through the bypass grafts and native coronary arteries are obtained.

CABG anatomy and imaging

To assess CABG patency, a thorough knowledge of CABG anatomy and its configuration on CTA is essential. There are 2 types of bypass grafts, arterial and venous (Figure 1). As a rule, arterial grafts are smaller in caliber than venous grafts. In order of frequency of use, graft arteries include the internal mammary arteries (IMAs), radial arteries (RAs), right gastroepiploic artery, and inferior epigastric artery. Although arterial grafts have better long-term outcomes, venous grafts, specifically saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), are more readily available.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1. A 53-year-old man underwent cardiac CT angiography (CTA) to evaluate for graft patency 7 months after multivessel bypass grafting. (A through C) Three-dimensional volumerendered images show the typical appearances of a right saphenous vein graft (SVG) sutured to the right anterior ascending aorta and connected to the posterior descending artery (not shown), and traversing the right atrioventricular groove (wide arrow). The right internal mammary artery (RIMA) is attached to the left anterior descending artery (narrow arrow). The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) is anastomosed sequentially to 2 diagonal branches distally (solid arrowhead). There is also a radial artery (RA) graft, which is connected to an obtuse marginal artery by crossing superiorly over the right ventricular outflow tract from the anterior ascending aorta (open arrowhead). Note the larger caliber of the SVG compared with the internal mammary arteries (IMAs) and RA. (D) A curved multiplanar reformatted (MPR) image shows the RIMA with multiple surgical clips along both sides of the artery that are used to ligate collateral branches. Although the distal RIMA and the distal anastomosis are not well enhanced, enhancement in the proximal portion makes distal occlusion unlikely. (E) A curved MPR image displays “side-to-side” anastomosis of the LIMA to a diagonal branch (arrow). The LIMA continues distally to anastomose to a different diagonal branch (not shown).

CTA following CABG surgery is done by first assessing the morphology and size of the ascending aorta and in the case of an in situ vessel, such as the IMA, the origin of the in situ vessel. Then, graft patency is assessed for homogeneous, contrast-enhanced graft lumen and for regular shape and border of the graft wall. The graft is usually divided into 3 different segments: the origin or proximal anastomosis of the graft, the body of the graft, and the single (or sequential) distal anastomosis.18 During the CTA evaluation of bypass grafts, the proximal anastomosis is usually better visualized than the distal anastomosis. In cases in which the distal anastomosis is not well evaluated, the bypass graft is usually considered patent as long as contrast is evident within the graft lumen.

Saphenous vein grafts

The SVG was first successfully used in a CABG operation in 1964.19 Both the benefits and limitations of SVG have been well documented in the literature. Saphenous veins are fairly simple to access and harvest from the lower extremities, and they are more versatile and widely available than arterial grafts. In addition, during the intra- and perioperative period, saphenous veins are resistant to spasm versus their arterial counterparts. However, the use of SVGs is limited by distortion from varicose and sclerotic disease as well as a higher occurrence of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerotic changes after exposure to systemic blood pressure, resulting in lower patency rates.5,7 Graft occlusion can also occur due to vascular damage during harvesting of the saphenous vein. In a large study, the SVG patency was 88% perioperatively, 81% at 1 year, 75% at 5 years, and 50% at ≥15 years.20 The graft attrition rate between 1 and 6 years after CABG surgery is 1% to 2% per year, and between 6 and 10 years is 4% per year.21 Nonetheless, the adminstration of antiplatelet and lipid-lowering medications and the continual improvement in surgical techniques have increased the patency of SVGs.22-24

Saphenous veins are attached proximally from the ascending aorta to the coronary artery distal to the diseased coronary lesion(s). The SVG can be sutured directly to the anterior portion of the ascending aorta or can be attached with an anastomotic device, allowing faster, sutureless attachment. The device alters the common appearance of the bypass graft by requiring the aortic connector to be anastomosed perpendicularly to the aorta. In order to support the course of the aortovenous anastomosis, the left-sided SVG is connected to the left side of the aorta, stabilizing the graft on top of the main pulmonary artery.25 A right-sided SVG is attached either to the lower aspect or right side of the ascending aorta, allowing the graft to traverse the right arterioventricular groove.

Saphenous grafts tend to appear as large contrast-filled vessels. An SVG to the right side is attached to the distal right coronary artery (RCA), posterior descending artery (PDA), or distal LAD artery (Figure 1). The distal anastomosis may lie on the phrenic wall of the heart (Figure 2). An SVG to the left side is attached distally to the LAD artery, diagonal artery, left circumflex (LCx) artery, or the obtuse marginal (OM) arteries, by traversing anteriorly and superiorly to the right ventricular outflow tract or main pulmonary artery. On occasion, the distal SVG is anastomosed sequentially to ≥2 coronary vessels or in the same vessel, using side-to-side and end-to-side anastomoses. The native vessel distal to the anastamotic site should be assessed and is recognized by its position and smaller caliber compared with the SVG. Typically, there are few if any surgical clips accompanying venous bypass grafts, lessening streak artifacts that may limit graft evaluation.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2. A 73-year-old woman underwent routine cardiac CT angiography 4 days after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for triple-vessel coronary artery disease. (A through C) These 3-dimensional volumerendered images show a right saphenous vein graft (SVG) connected to the right anterior ascending aorta and wrapping posterior to the right atrium to attach to the posterolateral branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery in the phrenic wall of the heart (arrows). The LIMA is attached to the LAD artery (solid arrowheads). The radial artery (RA) is sutured to an obtuse marginal artery, crossing underneath the LIMA (open arrowheads). (D) A curved multiplanar reformatted (MPR) image displays the large-caliber SVG traversing adjacent to the right atrium and crossing the posterior interventricular sulcus to anastomose to the posterolateral branch of the LAD artery. (E) This curved MPR image illustrates the RA with multiple surgical clips ligating collateral arterial branches.

Internal mammary artery grafts

Compared with the saphenous vein, the IMA has unique biological characteristics that enable it to resist atherosclerosis and maintain high patency rates. The IMA has a nonfenestrated internal elastic lamina and lacks vaso vasorum inside the vessel wall, which tends to protect against intimal hyperplasia and cellular migration.21 In addition, the medial layer of IMA is thin and is limited in muscle cells, resulting in a decreased tendency for maladaptive vasoconstriction. Moreover, the endo thelium produces platelet inhibitor (prostacyclin) and vasodilator (nitric oxide) and the lipid and glycosaminoglycan compositions are resistant to atherogenesis.26 Therefore, use of the IMA decreases all postoperative cardiac events and mortality, and is associated with a long-term patency rate well >90% at 10 years.21,27,28

Due to its proximity to the LAD artery and favorable patency rates, the left IMA (LIMA) is most commonly used as an in situ graft to revascularize the LAD or diagonal artery, supplying the anterior or anterolateral cardiac wall (Figure 3). The LIMA extends from its origin at the subclavian artery and courses through the anterior mediastinum along the right ventricular outflow tract after being separated surgically from its original position in the left parasternal region. Infrequently, sequential distal anastomoses, with side-to-side and end-to-side anastomoses to the diagonal and LAD arteries, respectively, or involving separate sections of the LAD artery, are performed (Figure 1).18 On CTA, the LIMA is usually visualized as a small vessel in the left anterior mediastinum. As with other grafts, the distal anastamosis is typically most difficult to visualize. Surgical clips are used routinely to occlude branch vessels of the IMA, and metallic artifact may limit assessment in some instances.29

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3. A 63-year-old man had a cardiac CT angiography (CTA) examination 7 months after undergoing a single-vessel coronary artery bypass graft procedure. (A) A curved multiplanar reformatted image shows a patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft within the anterior mediastinum (arrows). The graft extends from the origin to its distal anastomosis with the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. (B) A 3-dimensional volume-rendered image also illustrates the LIMA graft from its origin to its distal anastomosis with the LAD artery.

The right IMA (RIMA) is used less frequently than the LIMA. The RIMA can be placed as an in situ graft to revascularize the RCA or one of its branches. In cases in which both in situ IMAs are necessary to revascularize the left heart, either the LIMA is anastomosed to the LCx artery or other side branches (ie, OM or diagnonal branches) and the RIMA is attached to the LAD artery, or the LIMA is connected to the LAD artery and the RIMA is joined to the LCx artery or OM branches by extension through the transverse sinus of the pericardium (Figure 1).30 Otherwise, the RIMA can be resected from the right subclavian artery and used as a composite or free graft. As a composite or “Y” graft, the RIMA is anastomosed proximally to LIMA, allowing total arterial revascularization instead of using a venous graft with LIMA. Although still controversial, some studies have reported improved clinical outcomes using total arterial revascularization, with reduction of angina recurrence and improved patency rate over a LIMA graft coupled with an SVG.31-33 As a free graft, a RIMA is anastomosed to the anterior ascending aorta and used in the same way as an SVG. The CTA appearance of the RIMA is similar to that of the LIMA.

Radial artery

The use of the RA in CABG surgery was first described in 1973.34 The RA is usually harvested from the nondominant arm and is used as a third arterial graft, either as a free or composite graft or to avoid using a venous graft (Figure 4). As a muscular artery from the forearm, the RA has a prominent medial layer and elevated vasoreactivity, which results in a lower patency rate than that of IMA grafts. On CTA, the caliber of the RA is similar to the IMA, but it typically is visualized coursing from the ascending aorta to the native coronary artery (Figures 1 and 2). In the early postoperative period, the RA may be reduced in caliber and may be difficult to identify because of vasospasm. In addition, because the RA is a muscular artery, a larger number of surgical clips may be needed to ligate collaterals as compared with IMA grafts. These clips may limit a full CTA evaluation of an RA graft.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4. A 60-year-old woman underwent routine cardiac CT angiography (CTA) 7 days after bypass grafting. (A and B) Three-dimensional volume-rendered images show total arterial revascularization of the left ventricle using a radial artery (RA) and the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to form a “Y” composite graft. The “free” left RA is attached proximally to mid-LIMA and connected to an obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex artery (arrowheads). The LIMA originates from the left subclavian artery and anastomoses to a diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery (arrows). (C) This linear reformatted image shows the LIMA with an “end-to-side” RA. The evaluation of the proximal RA anastomosis is limited because of surgical clips in the region. However, opacification of the RA with contrast suggests the graft is patent.

Other arteries

The use of right gastroepiploic and inferior epigastric arteries in CABG procedures has been limited because of the need to extend the median sternotomy to expose the abdominal cavity. Although the use of these arteries increases surgical time and technical difficulty of the surgery, these arteries can be used as a free graft to perform total arterial revascularization.35-37 In rare instances, the right gastroepiploic artery may be used in situ to the PDA. These instances require that the surgical history be conveyed to the radiologist so the CTA protocol can be modified to include the upper abdomen, because the gastroepiploic artery is freed to course anteriorly to the liver and through the diaphragm to reach the target vessel (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5. A 69-year-old man with a history of prior bypass surgery presented with new high-grade proximal lesion in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. The patient underwent another cardiac bypass surgery using a gastroepipolic graft. (A) An axial image of the upper abdomen shows a well-enhanced gastroepiploic graft (arrow) dissected off the greater curvature of the stomach and traversing superiorly to the thoracic space (not shown). (B) A 3-dimensional volume-rendered image illustrates the gastroepiploic graft extending from below the diaphragm to anastomose to the distal LAD artery anteriorly (arrows).

Complications

Graft thrombosis and occlusion

Bypass graft failures are classified either as early or late following CABG surgery. During the early phase, usually within 1 month after CABG surgery, the most common cause of graft failure is thrombosis from platelet dysfunction at the site of focal endothelial damage during surgical harvesting and anastomosis.20 Additionally, other factors (such as the hypercoagulability state of the patient and the high-pressure distension or stretching of the venous graft, with its intrinsically weaker antithrombotic features) further initiate early venous graft failure, resulting in a 3% to 12% occlusion rate within 1 month postoperatively.21

Late-phase venous graft failure is due primarily to progressive changes related to systemic blood pressure exposure.38 One month after surgery, the venous graft starts to undergo neointimal hyperplasia.21 Although this process does not produce significant stenosis, it is the foundation for later development of graft atheroma. Beyond 1 year, athero sclerosis is the dominant process, resulting in graft stenosis and occlusion. On the other hand, arterial grafts, specifically IMA grafts, are resistant to atheroma development. Late IMA graft failure is more commonly due to progression of atherosclerotic disease in the native coronary artery distal to the graft anastomosis.39

CT angiography can delineate multiple findings associated with graft stenosis and occlusion. Calcified and noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque is readily identified, and the calculation of the extent of graft narrowing is straightforward (Figure 6). Occlusion can be determined by nonvisualization of a vessel known to have been used for surgical grafting. In many instances, the most proximal part of an occluded aortocoronary graft fills with contrast, creating a small, telltale outpouching or “nubbin” from the ascending aorta, allowing a diagnosis (Figure 7). A “ghost” of part of the occluded graft may be visible. Acute or chronic graft occlusion can sometimes be differentiated by the diameter of the bypass graft. In chronic occlusion, the diameter is usually reduced from scarring, as compared with acute occlusion in which the diameter is usually enlarged.

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6. A 56-year-old man with a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery 10 years ago underwent cardiac CT angiography for recurrent chest pain. This curved multiplanar reformatted image shows a noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque that is causing a 50% stenosis of the saphenous vein graft to the obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex artery (arrow).
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7. A 70-year-old man with a history of coronary bypass procedure 13 years prior under went routine cardiac CT angiography after repeat bypass surgery. This 3-dimensional volume-rendered image illustrates a completely occluded saphenous vein graft (SVG) sutured proximally to the left anterior ascending aorta (arrow). There is a patent SVG to the diagonal branch (solid arrowheads) and a patent left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery (open arrowheads).

Graft malposition

Early bypass graft failure can also be due to a malpositioned graft.40 If the graft is too long, it may twist or kink (Figure 8). If the graft is too short, it may stretch, a particular problem in severe chronic obstructive lung disease patients with hyperinflated lungs. As described previously, the aortic connector can also play a role in kinking the bypass graft if the vessel is not supported adequately.

FIGURE 8.
FIGURE 8. A 59-year-old man underwent routine cardiac CT angiography 4 days after coronary artery bypass graft surgery for triplevessel coronary artery disease with right coronary artery infarction. This axial image shows a proximal anastomosis of a saphenous vein graft to the anterior ascending aorta that appears kinked or malpositioned to the left (arrow), although the graft extends to the posterior descending artery through the right atrioventricular groove (not shown).

Graft vasospasm

As previously noted, RA grafts are susceptible to vasospasm. The appearance is similar to fixed graft stenosis, although the luminal narrowing is more extensive in length. Nevertheless, the administration of intraoperative alpha-adrenergic blocking agents or posteroperative calcium channel blockers can overcome many cases of graft vasospasm postoperatively.28,41 Today, the patency rate for RA grafts is approximately 92% at 10 years, similar to IMA grafts.

Graft aneurysm

There are 2 types of bypass graft aneurysms: true aneurysms and pseudo aneurysms. True aneuryms are usually found 5 to 7 years after CABG surgery and are related to atherosclerotic disease.42 On the other hand, occurrences of pseudoaneurysms are more variable, although these lesions are usually found at the anastomotic site (Figure 9). Pseudo-aneurysm cases that are found earlier may be related to infection or tension at the anastomotic site, resulting in suture rupture. In late-onset pseudoaneurysms, similar to true aneurysms, atherosclerotic changes likely played a role.43

FIGURE 9.
FIGURE 9. A 65-year-old man underwent routine cardiac CT angiography (CTA) 3 days after 3-vessel coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure. (A) A curved multiplanar reformatted image shows 3 aneurysmal dilatations (arrows) in the saphenous vein graft (SVG) from the anterior ascending aorta to the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. These are most likely pseudoaneurysms, since the CABG procedure took place 2 days prior to the acquisition of CTA images. (B) A 3-dimensional volume-rendered image also illustrates multiple pseudoaneurysms from the SVG after arising from the right anterior ascending aorta, crossing between the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and the main pulmonary artery (wide arrows). There is a radial artery attached proximally and far right to the right anterior ascending aorta (open arrowheads) and anastomosing distally to the posterior descending artery (not shown). In addition, a LIMA is attached distally to the LAD artery (solid arrowheads). Note the extensive irregularities of the native right coronary artery and LAD artery that represent diffuse atherosclerotic disease (narrow arrows).

Currently, there is no clear guideline for surgery. Size >2 cm has been a cause for concern. Graft aneurysms can lead to various complications, including compression and mass effect on adjacent structures, thrombosis and embolization of the bypass graft leading to an acute coronary event, formation of fistula to the right atrium and ventricle, sudden rupture leading to hemothorax, hemopericardium, or death.42

Pericardial and pleural effusions

Approximately 75% of patients have postoperative pericardial effusions after CABG surgery (Figure 10).44 Although pericardial effusions are common, only 0.3% of patients progress to cardiac temponade.45 Risk factors include postoperative coagulation abnormality or use of anticoagulation agents. Nearly all significant pericardial effusions are diagnosed within 5 days postoperatively, peak in 10 days, and resolve within a month.46 Postoperative pleural effusions are even more numerous after surgery, a prevalence of 89% 7 days after surgery.47 These pleural effusions are usually unilateral, small, left-sided, and without clinical significance.

FIGURE 10.
FIGURE 10. A 45-year-old man underwent routine cardiac CT angiography 3 days after single-vessel bypass grafting. This single axial image shows bilateral pleural effusions with minimal compressive atelectasis and a left focal consolidation of the lung. In addition, there is focal hematoma (arrow) surrounding the left internal mammary artery (arrowhead) as well as subcutaneous emphysema, likely postoperative change from the recent coronary artery bypass graft procedure. No significant pericardial effusion is identified.

Sternal infection

Another important complication of the CABG procedure is sternal infection, with a prevalence of 1% to 20%.48,49 Risk factors include diabetes mellitus, obesity, complexity of surgery, length of surgical time, and blood transfusions. Three different compartments may be affected: the presternal (cellulitis, sinus tracts, abscess), sternal (osteomyelitis, dehiscence), or retrosternal (mediastinitis, hematoma, abscess) compartments.50 The mortality rate is high; a recent study reported a 1-year mortality rate of approximately 22%.51 Thus, CTA is important in revealing the extent and depth of infection, which, in turn, will help guide treatment planning.52 Usually, the preservation of mediastinal fat planes in CTA excludes surgical intervention. On the other hand, obliteration of mediastinum fat planes and diffuse soft tissue infiltration without or with gas collection, or low-density fluid collections within the mediastinum, are concerning for sternal infection.53

Incidental findings

Although the intent of CTA after CABG surgery is to assess bypass graft patency and surgical complications, incidental findings are also frequently detected. In a recent study, 13.1% of patients in the immediate postoperative period had unsuspected noncardiac findings, including pulmonary embolism, pulmonary nodules, pneumonia, mucous plugging, and pneumothorax.54 Therefore, radiologists need to be aware of clinically significant findings with possible life-threatening consequences.

Conclusion

In recent years, CTA technology has evolved substantially, allowing radiologists to evaluate bypass graft patency noninvasively with greater confidence. In addition, other postoperative complications that may cause recurrent chest pain can be investigated. Thus, it is crucial that radiologists be familiar with the different types of grafts used in CABG, possible complications, and incidental findings to maximize the effectiveness of CTA after bypass surgery.